Skip to content
South King County Food Coalition Skcfc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

South King County Food Coalition Skcfc

To increase program impact and foster innovation by providing support, resources, advocacy, and standards for emergency food programs serving communities in south king county.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$196k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$5.1MHuman Services$805kPublic Safety & Disaster$6k
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $194k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $893k
$61,199
Median grant
2
States reached
$687k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE AUBURN FOOD BANK$196,032
WHITE CENTER FOOD BANK$154,125
KENT FOOD BANK & EMERGENCY SERVICES$93,495
MULTI-SERVICE CENTER$89,096
DES MOINES AREA FOOD BANK$88,527
TUKWILA FOOD PANTRY$83,297
RENTON-SALVATION ARMY FOOD BANK$72,409
LIVING WELL KENT$61,199
MAKING A DIFFERENCE FOUNDATION$55,292
HIGHLINE AREA FOOD BANK$48,229
MAPLE VALLEY FOOD BANK$32,536
EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES$31,160
SUSTAINABLE RENTON$29,391
VASHON-MAURY ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$26,618
PLATEAU OUTREACH MINISTRIES$26,169
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $835k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%RAPID RELIEF TEAM: $6k → 7%PLATEAU OUTREACH MINISTRIES: $50k → 9%PLATEAU OUTREACH MINISTRIES: $26k → 9%PLATEAU OUTREACH MINISTRIES: $25k → 9%PLATEAU OUTREACH MINISTRIES: $7k → 9%KENT FOOD BANK: $125k → 9%KENT FOOD BANK & EMERGENCY SERVICES: $119k → 9%KENT FOOD BANK & EMERGENCY SERVICES: $117k → 9%KENT FOOD BANK & EMERGENCY SERVICES: $107k → 9%KENT FOOD BANK & EMERGENCY SERVICES: $93k → 9%KENT FOOD BANK: $44k → 9%KENT FOOD BANK: $43k → 9%KENT FOOD BANK: $43k → 9%EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $31k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.7M · 18 repeat orgs$197k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
3

Total granted

$5.7M
$130k

Still filing today

72%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyInternationalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AUBURN FOOD BANK
    8× · 2017–2024 · $930k · revenue +41%
  • WC
    WHITE CENTER EMERGENCY FOOD ASSOCIATION WHITE CENTER FOOD BANK
    8× · 2017–2024 · $798k · revenue +254%
  • KF
    KENT FOOD BANK AND EMERGENCY SERVICES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $690k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • RA
    RENTON-SALVATION ARMY FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2021 · $74k
  • VI
    VASHON-MAURY ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • CS
    COVINGTON STOREHOUSE
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Port Angeles Food Bank

Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.

Food & Nutrition
2
Snoqualmie Valley Food Bank

Our mission is to provide food and key resources to help our neighbors and community thrive. we lead the effort to feed, educated and advocate ending hunger in the snoqualmie valley and beyond.

Food & Nutrition
3
West Seattle Food Bank

West Seattle Food Bank strengthens the community through the power of neighbors helping neighbors, working to ensure all in our community have access to the essential necessities of living.

Food & Nutrition
4
Renewal Food Bank

Renewal Food Bank provides food to needy and economically vulnerable individuals who live in Bellevue, Washington and surrounding communities

Human Services
5
Nourish Pierce County

To provide food to individuals in need with compassion, dignity and respect. No one needing assistance is turned away.

—
6
Alameda Emergency Food Dba Alameda Food Bank

Founded in 1977, The Alameda Food Bank is a non-profit organization that helps Alameda residents in need by providing nourishing food in compassionate and respectful manner with the support of dedicated volunteers and local partners.

Food & Nutrition
7
Snohomish Community Food Bank

To provide food and services in a caring and dignified manner to neighbors in need

—
8
Nooksack Valley Food Bank Association

Our mission is to provide a variety of food products to families and individuals who are in need. We are open one day a week.

Food & Nutrition
9
Puyallup Food Bank

We are passionate about meeting the urgent needs of our neighbors and partnering to assist them, believing food is the first step on their journey to a more hopeful future!

Human Services
10
Yakima Rotary Food Bank

To Provide nutitious food of their choice to those requesting our assistance, with minimal barriers.

—
11
Lake Chelan Food Bank

The mission of Lake Chelan Food Bank is to treat each person we serve with dignity and respect and to provide balanced and varied options that give each person the liberty to meet the specific food needs for themsevles and/or their family.

Food & Nutrition
12
Ferndale Food Bank

The ferndale food bank is a local food bank that distrbutes food to community members in need of assistance.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Des Moines Area Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Kiwanis Club of Enumclaw Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
16/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WHITE CENTER EMERGENCY FOOD ASSOCIATION WHITE CENTER FOOD BANK: $797,997 · OtherWHITE CENTER EMERGENCY FOOD ASSOCIATION WHITE CENT…DES MOINES AREA FOOD BANK: $488,924 · OtherDES MOINES AREA FOOD BANKMAPLE VALLEY FOOD BANK AND EMERGENCY SERVICES: $317,559 · OtherMAPLE VALLEY FOOD BANK AND EMERGENCY SERVICESTUKWILA PANTRY: $268,484 · OtherTUKWILA PANTRYTUKWILA FOOD PANTRY: $212,396 · OtherTUKWILA FOOD PANTRYRENTON SALVATION ARMY: $156,042 · OtherRENTON SALVATION ARMYVASHON MAURY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $122,448 · Other+5 more: $234,468 · Other+5 moreKENT FOOD BANK AND EMERGENCY SERVICES: $690,356 · Human ServicesKENT FOOD BANK AND EMERGENCY…MULTI-SERVICE CENTER: $636,337 · Human ServicesMULTI-SERVICE CENTERPLATEAU OUTREACH MINISTRIES: $107,417 · Human ServicesPLATEAU OUTREACH MINISTRIES+2 more: $36,892 · Human ServicesAUBURN FOOD BANK: $929,545 · PhilanthropyAUBURN FOOD BANKHIGHLINE AREA FOOD BANK: $332,389 · Food & NutritionHIGHLINE AREA …FOOD LIFELINE: $225,478 · Food & NutritionFOOD LIFELINELIVING WELL KENT COLLABORATIVE: $99,385 · Food & NutritionLIVING WELL KE…The Storehouse Inc: $83,662 · Food & NutritionThe Storehouse…MAKING A DIFFERENCE FOUNDATION: $92,386 · InternationalSustainable Renton: $29,391 · Environment
Other$2,598,318Human Services$1,471,002Philanthropy$929,545Food & Nutrition$740,914International$92,386Environment$29,391

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAUBURN FOOD BANK: $929,545 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetWHITE CENTER EMERGENCY FOOD ASSOCIATION WHITE CENTER FOOD BANK: $797,997 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetKENT FOOD BANK AND EMERGENCY SERVICES: $690,356 over 8y, 5.9% of budgetMULTI-SERVICE CENTER: $636,337 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetDES MOINES AREA FOOD BANK: $488,924 over 7y, 3.6% of budgetHIGHLINE AREA FOOD BANK: $332,389 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetMAPLE VALLEY FOOD BANK AND EMERGENCY SERVICES: $317,559 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetFOOD LIFELINE: $225,478 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVASHON MAURY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $122,448 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetPLATEAU OUTREACH MINISTRIES: $107,417 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetLIVING WELL KENT COLLABORATIVE: $99,385 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetMAKING A DIFFERENCE FOUNDATION: $92,386 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetThe Storehouse Inc: $83,662 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetKIWANIS CLUB OF ENUMCLAW FOUNDATION: $68,910 over 6y, 19% of budgetEast African Community Services: $31,160 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSustainable Renton: $29,391 over 1y, 44% of budgetRAPID RELIEF TEAM LLC: $5,732 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AUBURN FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds WHITE CENTER EMERGENCY FOOD ASSOCIATION WHITE CENTER FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds KENT FOOD BANK AND EMERGENCY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds MULTI-SERVICE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DES MOINES AREA FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLINE AREA FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds MAPLE VALLEY FOOD BANK AND EMERGENCY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds FOOD LIFELINE ↗
  • Who funds VASHON MAURY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds PLATEAU OUTREACH MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds LIVING WELL KENT COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds MAKING A DIFFERENCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Storehouse Inc ↗
  • Who funds KIWANIS CLUB OF ENUMCLAW FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds East African Community Services ↗
  • Who funds Sustainable Renton ↗
  • Who funds RAPID RELIEF TEAM LLC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Northwest Harvest EmmPuget Sound Energy Fo…United Way of King Co…Food LifelineMulti-Service CenterSeattle FoundationThe Albertsons Compan…Renton Regional Commu…Lucky Seven FoundationThe Norcliffe Foundat…Mightycause Charitabl…American Online Givin…
Northwest Harvest EmmWA34.3× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Northwest Harvest Emm · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · United Way of King County · Food Lifeline · Multi-Service Center · Seattle Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Renton Regional Community Fndn · Lucky Seven Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization South King County Food Coalition Skcfc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from South King County Food Coalition Skcfc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on South King County Food Coalition Skcfc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home