· Public charity
Society of St Vincent de Paul Particular Council of San Mateo Inc
Safety net services were provided to 16,146 unduplicated needy adults & children via: direct assistance (peninsula family resource center & homeless help centers); restorative justice ministry; & thrift stores.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $367,825 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,106,704 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $738,879 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
- $250k+1 grant · $343k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL PARTICULAR COUNCIL OF SAN MATEO INC | $342,825 |
| SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COUNCIL OF LOS ANGELES | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $368k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
13 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $368k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SOSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL PARTICULAR COUNCIL OF SAN MATEO8× · 2017–2024 · $697k
- SOSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL PARTICULAR COUNCIL OF SAN MATEO8× · 2017–2024 · $647k
- SOSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL PARTICULAR COUNCIL OF SAN MATEO5× · 2017–2022 · $71k
Funded once
- SOSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL PARTICULAR COUNCIL OF SAN MATEOone grant, 2021 · $15k
- SOSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL PARTICULAR COUNCIL OF SAN MATEOone grant, 2024 · $10k
- SOSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL PARTICULAR COUNCIL OF SAN MATEOone grant, 2017 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 17. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Society of St Vincent de Paul Particular Council of San Mateo Inc?
Find your warmest path to Society of St Vincent de Paul Particular Council of San Mateo Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.