Skip to content

· Public charity

Society of St Vincent de Paul Hernando Citrus District Council

The organization's mission is to provide charitable assistance to those in need by offering material, moral, and spiritual support.

$110k
Granted FY2023
6
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Human Services$827kInternational$110kReligion$18k
02FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$18,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JOAN OF ARC CONFERENCE$22,000
ST THOMAS CONFERENCE$19,000
ST FRANCIS CABRINI$18,000
ST ANTHONY$17,000
ST MARY CONFERENCE$17,000
ST THERESA CONFERENCE$17,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $183k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ST JOAN OF ARC CONFERENCE: $46k → 12%ST JOAN OF ARC CONFERENCE: $25k → 12%ST JOAN OF ARC CONFERENCE: $25k → 12%ST JOAN OF ARC CONFERENCE: $25k → 12%ST JOAN OF ARC CONFERENCE: $22k → 12%ST MARY CONFERENCE: $22k → 12%ST JOAN OF ARC CONFERENCE: $19k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$898k · 7 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$898k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
-1%

Still filing today

14%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ST JOAN OF ARC CONFERENCE
    6× · 2017–2023 · $162k · revenue +12% · 78% of their budget
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ST ANNE CONFERENCE
    5× · 2017–2022 · $155k · revenue -68% · 74% of their budget
  • ST
    ST THERESA CONFERENCE
    6× · 2017–2023 · $150k

Funded once

  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ST MARY OUR LADY OF SORROWS CONF
    one grant, 2017 · $22k · revenue -1% · 56% of their budget
  • SA
    ST ANTHONYS
    one grant, 2019 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/3
Grantees still filing
1/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ST ANNE CONFERENCE: $155,188 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ST ANNE CONFERENCEST THERESA CONFERENCE: $149,625 · OtherST THERESA CONFERENCEST THOMAS CONFERENCE: $133,125 · OtherST THOMAS CONFERENCEST FRANCES CABRINI: $123,625 · OtherST FRANCES CABRINIST MARY CONFERENCE: $111,563 · OtherST MARY CONFERENCEST ANTHONY: $63,438 · OtherST ANTHONY+2 more: $35,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ST JOAN OF ARC CONFERENCE: $161,875 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT…SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ST MARY OUR LADY OF SORROWS CONF: $21,500 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT…
Other$771,564Human Services$183,375

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ST JOAN OF ARC CONFERENCE: $161,875 over 6y, 78% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ST ANNE CONFERENCE: $155,188 over 5y, 74% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ST MARY OUR LADY OF SORROWS CONF: $21,500 over 1y, 56% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ST JOAN OF ARC CONFERENCE ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ST ANNE CONFERENCE ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ST MARY OUR LADY OF SORROWS CONF ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Society of St Vincent de Paul Hernando Citrus District Council funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Society of St Vincent de Paul Hernando Citrus District Council. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $1.7M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Society of St Vincent de Paul Hernando Citrus District Council’s filings →

    More from the funding graph