Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Society of American Foresters

The mission of the SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS is to advance sustainable management of forest resources through science, education, and technology, promoting professional excellence while ensuring the continued health, integrity, and use of forests to benefit society in perpetuity.

$117k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Environment$307k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 6 grants below total $34,780 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $117,037 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $82,257 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$5,280
Median grant
6
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
APPALACHIAN SAF$7,600
WISCONSIN SAF$6,800
WASHINGTON SAF$5,280
NEW ENGLAND SAF$5,100
OREGON SAF$5,000
DAKOTAS SAF$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 72% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%INTERMOUNTAIN SAF: $11k → 8%MINNESOTA SAF: $7k → 17%MONTANA SAF: $6k → 11%ALLEGHENY SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS: $7k → 6%SOUTHWESTERN SAF: $12k → 14%APPALACHIAN SAF: $13k → 11%WISCONSIN SAF: $8k → 6%WISCONSIN SAF: $13k → 14%OREGON SAF: $5k → 11%OREGON SAF: $7k → 15%APPALACHIAN SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS: $14k → 12%APPALACHIAN SAF: $6k → 19%COLORADOWYOMING SAF: $13k → 7%OHIO SAF: $6k → 15%WASHINGTON SAF: $5k → 18%MISSISSIPPI SAF: $8k → 23%APPALACHIAN SAF: $8k → 7%VIRGINIA TECH: $5k → 21%DAKOTAS SAF: $5k → 11%DAKOTAS SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS: $6k → 14%NEW ENGLAND SAF: $8k → 10%ALLEGHENY SAF: $10k → 18%WISCONSIN SAF: $8k → 14%OREGON SAF: $5k → 15%APPALACHIAN SAF: $11k → 12%MISSISSIPPI SAF: $5k → 23%APPALACHIAN SAF: $7k → 7%DAKOTAS SAF: $5k → 14%NEW ENGLAND SAF: $6k → 10%ALLEGHENY SAF: $5k → 18%WISCONSIN SAF: $7k → 14%APPALACHIAN SAF: $10k → 12%NEW ENGLAND SAF: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
ID
MT
MN
WI
OR
SD
OH
PA
CO
VA
MD
NM
NC
SC
DC
MS

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 10% of Society of American Foresters’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Society of American Foresterslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$200k · 8 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

$200k
$102k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+36%

Still filing today

63%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    Allegheny Society of American Foresters
    3× · 2018–2020 · $23k · revenue +35%
  • NE
    NEW ENGLAND SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS
    3× · 2021–2024 · $19k · revenue +127%
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS
    2× · 2019–2024 · $13k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • SF
    SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $40k · revenue +36%
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS
    one grant, 2022 · $13k
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS
    one grant, 2021 · $12k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
05the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Appalachian Society of American Forester — $62,522 · OtherAppalachian Society of American ForesterSOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS — $36,849 · OtherSOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERSAllegheny Society of American Foresters — $22,595 · OtherAllegheny Society of American ForestersNEW ENGLAND SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS — $19,450 · OtherNEW ENGLAND SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERSOregon Society of American Foresters — $16,923 · OtherOregon Society of American ForestersSOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS — $15,829 · OtherSOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERSMISSISSIPPI SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FOR ESTERS — $13,225 · OtherSOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS — $12,704 · OtherSOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS — $12,531 · OtherSOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS — $12,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS — $11,325 · Other+4 more — $25,592 · Other+4 moreSUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE INC — $40,000 · EnvironmentSUSTAINABLE FO…VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Education
Other$261,545Environment$40,000Education$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAppalachian Society of American Forester — $62,522 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetSUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEW ENGLAND SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS — $19,450 over 3y, 12% of budgetOregon Society of American Foresters — $16,923 over 3y, 8.6% of budgetSOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS — $12,531 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Appalachian Society of American Forester
  • Who funds SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE INC
  • Who funds Allegheny Society of American Foresters
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS
  • Who funds Oregon Society of American Foresters
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTERS
  • Who funds VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Society of American Foresters funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Oregon Society of American Foresters12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph