Skip to content
Society for Reproductive Investigation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Society for Reproductive Investigation Inc

Advance reproductive health for all, through (1) outstanding foundational, translational, and clinical science, (2) training and mentoring future generations of investigators, (3) embracing diversity, (4) advocacy engaging funding agencies, policy makers, donors and communities and, (5) promoting excellence in reproductive science…

$65k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Science & Tech$389kHealth$275kEducation$185kArts & Culture$25k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $12,812, the rows itemized in this filing. The $65,483 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $52,671 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$12,812
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUKE UNIVERSITY$12,812
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 76% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $50k → 15%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $20k → 16%CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $20k → 14%ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $20k → 28%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH: $15k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $20k → 15%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $40k → 16%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $25k → 21%OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVE: $50k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $20k → 13%University of Washington: $50k → 9%JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL: $20k → 19%MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER: $15k → 28%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $30k → 16%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $20k → 21%OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 12%JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL: $20k → 19%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 16%REPRODUCTIVE SCIENTIST DEV PR: $16k → 21%OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 12%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 16%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $16k → 21%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 16%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
OH
CT
CA
NE
MO
MD
AZ
NC
TX

Grants abroad, by region: $32k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions, $5k to organizations and $27k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$25k · 77% · 1 grant · 8 people

Stated purpose: INTERNATIONAL GRANT · ANNUAL MEETING AWARD

East Asia and the Pacific$7k · 23% · 4 people

Stated purpose: INTERNATIONAL GRANT · FAMILY CARE GRANT · ANNUAL MEETING AWARD

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$390k · 6 repeat orgs$389k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
16

Total granted

$390k
$389k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+25%

Still filing today

67%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $77k · revenue +76%
  • OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $40k · revenue +37%
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $38k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • OH
    OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
3
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
4
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
5
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
6
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
7
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
8
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
9
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
10
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
11
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
12
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montefiore Medical Center; the most unlike its peers is G Stewart for Johns Hopkins Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $150,000 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONAOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · OtherOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONCURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI SPECIAL TR: $45,000 · OtherCURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI SPECIAL TRG STEWART FOR JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL: $40,000 · OtherG STEWART FOR JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITALTEXAS WOMANS UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · OtherState University of Iowa: $20,000 · OtherALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE INC: $20,000 · OtherBOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA: $20,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $20,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $20,000 · Other+3 more: $44,335 · Other+3 moreWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $77,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYYale University: $75,000 · EducationYale UniversityOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $40,000 · EducationOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY…DUKE UNIVERSITY: $37,812 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAN…PONCE MEDICAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · EducationPONCE MEDICAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION IN…CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $20,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corporation: $20,000 · HealthMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER: $15,000 · Health
Other$549,335Education$269,812Health$55,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $77,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYale University: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetG STEWART FOR JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL: $40,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $37,812 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPONCE MEDICAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds G STEWART FOR JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PONCE MEDICAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Society for Reproductive Investigation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Society for Reproductive Investigation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Yale University: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Oregon Health & Science University Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Society for Reproductive Investigation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Society for Reproductive Investigation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Society for Reproductive Investigation’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home