Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Smith Memorial Scholarship Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$22k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$163k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$446k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI COLUMBIA$10,000
STATE FAIR COMMUNITY COLLEGE$7,000
UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI$2,000
MISSOURI VALLEY COLLEGE$1,500
NORTHWEST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%STATE FAIR COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $7k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI: $2k → 14%CARSON PRICE AND STATE TECHNICAL: $2k → 15%BLAKE SCHROEDER AND MIDAMERICA NAZA: $3k → 13%MICHAEL GERKEN: $3k → 15%LOGAN ARNOLD AND STATE TECH COLLEGE: $2k → 13%KYLIE BAKER AND NORTHWEST MISSOURI: $3k → 15%CHELSEA SCHROEDER: $2k → 13%MISSOURI VALLEY COLLEGE: $2k → 15%LACEY TAYLOR: $2k → 13%TANNER DOHRMAN AND MISSOURI S&T: $2k → 15%COLE MURPHY AND LAKE LAND COLLEGE: $2k → 13%KADE HUDSON AND STATE FAIR: $2k → 13%ADDISON SNIDER AND UNIV OF MISSOURI: $4k → 15%TRENT BARGFREDE: $3k → 15%MAKENZIE VOGELSMEIER AND UCM: $3k → 15%ALLISON TRAUTMAN AND UNIV CENT MISS: $3k → 15%DELANA VOGELSMEIER AND MISSOURI VAL: $3k → 15%CORBIN ZIMMERSCHIED AND STATE FAIR: $3k → 15%LINDSEY WINSTON AND UNIVERSITY OF: $2k → 15%ARABELLA BREDEHOEFT & STATE FAIR: $2k → 15%MAKENZIE SIMS AND STATE FAIR CC: $2k → 15%ZACHARY VOGELSMEIER AND UNIV OF MO: $2k → 15%GRANT KNIPMEYER AND UNIV OF MO: $2k → 15%HUNTER SIMS AND MO VALLEY COLLEGE: $2k → 15%LYRIC SNYDER AND UNIV OF MO COLUMBI: $2k → 15%KYNLEIGH FUEHRING AND STATE FAIR CC: $2k → 15%KATELYN EVANS: $2k → 15%HADLEIGH WINFREY AND MISSOURI STATE: $2k → 15%HAYLEIGH MARLIN: $2k → 15%KATELIN LOONEY: $2k → 15%HANNA VIETS: $2k → 15%BROOKE VOGELSMEIER: $2k → 15%JAELYN WINFREY AND STATE FAIR COMM: $2k → 15%SHANE WINSTON AND UNIV OF CENTRAL M: $2k → 15%EMILEE HALL AND UNIV OF CENTRAL MO: $2k → 15%DONAVAN HOYES AND UNIV OF CENTRAL M: $2k → 15%SAMANTHA BUTTS AND ACADEMY OF: $2k → 15%BAILEY BOLAND: $2k → 15%JANTZ SULLIVAN AND UNIVERSITY OF: $2k → 15%ALEXIS WINFREY: $2k → 15%KYLEE WINFREY: $2k → 15%BONNIE HERRICK AND STATE FAIR: $2k → 15%RACHEL VOGELSMEIER AND STATE FAIR C: $2k → 15%TYLER FENNER AND GRAND RIVER: $2k → 15%MARIAH HARPER: $2k → 15%MAKENNA REID AND STATE FAIR COMM CO: $1k → 15%SYDNEY REYNOLDS AND UNIV OF CENTRAL: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

15%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$24k · 6 repeat orgs$139k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
82

Total granted

$24k
$117k

Still filing today

0%
1%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    ADDISON SNIDER AND UNIV OF MISSOURI
    4× · 2020–2023 · $7k
  • ZV
    ZACHARY VOGELSMEIER AND UNIV OF MO
    3× · 2021–2023 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2017–2019 · $4k

Funded once

  • MV
    MAKENZIE VOGELSMEIER AND UCM
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • CZ
    CORBIN ZIMMERSCHIED AND STATE FAIR
    one grant, 2023 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
0/2
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI COLUMBIA — $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI COLUMBIAADDISON SNIDER AND UNIV OF MISSOURI — $7,000 · OtherSTATE FAIR COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $7,000 · Other+89 more — $137,051 · Other+89 moreMISSOURI VALLEY COLLEGE — $1,500 · Education
Other$161,051Education$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCRISTO REY KANSAS CITY SISTERS OF CHARI TY OF LEAVENWORTH HIGH SCHOOL — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI VALLEY COLLEGE — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CRISTO REY KANSAS CITY SISTERS OF CHARI TY OF LEAVENWORTH HIGH SCHOOL

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Smith Memorial Scholarship Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 93 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph