Skip to content

· Private foundation

Smith Fries Foundation Uti 111787

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$86k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$398kEducation$175kHuman Services$149kHousing & Shelter$146kHealth$107kInternational$14kPublic Benefit$12kRecreation & Sports$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $62k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $24k
$2,400
Median grant
12
States reached
$929k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIGHT STARS OF BETHLEHEM$24,000
MESSIAH LUTHERAN CHURCH$7,000
HOPE INTERNATIONAL$7,000
LUTHERAN HOUR$5,000
METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES$5,000
MERCY SHIPS$4,000
LUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES$3,000
TURNING POINT USA$3,000
REVELATION MEDIA INC$3,000
VOICE OF THE MARTYRS INC$3,000
UPLIFT INC$2,400
GORDON PARKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$2,400
FLORIDA COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS$2,000
CASA$2,000
GRACE PLACE$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $158k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOPE CHILDREN'S HOME: $20k → 13%BLUE STAR SERVICE DOGS: $25 → 5%LUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES: $6k → 14%LUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES: $5k → 14%LUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES: $5k → 14%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $19k → 13%LUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES: $3k → 14%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $16k → 13%LUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES: $2k → 14%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $5k → 13%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $5k → 13%Metropolitan Ministries: $5k → 13%METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES: $5k → 13%Healing House Inc: $5k → 15%HEALING HOUSE INC: $2k → 15%BIG CAT RESCUE: $1k → 13%BIG CAT RESCUE: $1k → 13%Hope Children's Home: $30k → 13%HOPE CHILDRENS HOME: $15k → 13%HOPE CHILDRENS HOME: $5k → 13%Big Cat Rescue: $1k → 13%BIG CAT RESCUE: $1k → 13%BIG CAT RESCUE: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
PA
CA
UT
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$947k · 31 repeat orgs$214k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
54

Total granted

$947k
$202k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+17%

Still filing today

52%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesEducationHealthInternationalPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PHIL'S FRIENDS NFP
    8× · 2017–2025 · $99k · revenue +134%
  • HI
    Hope International Ministries Inc
    4× · 2017–2020 · $70k · revenue +52%
  • COMMUNITY ACTION STOPS ABUSE INC
    4× · 2019–2025 · $62k · revenue +138%

Funded once

  • BS
    Brights Stars of Bethlehem
    one grant, 2017 · $35k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
  • EC
    Excel Charter School
    one grant, 2017 · $22k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
2
Hope for Paws

Hope for paws rescues dogs and all other animals who are suffering on the streets and in shelters. our goal is to educate people on the importance of companion animals in our society, to reduce euthanasia rates at shelters, (continued on…

Animals
3
Pasado's Safe Haven

Fighting to end animal cruelty and create a more compassionate world.(continued in schedule o)fiscal year 2024-2025 highlights include:investigated/resourced 71 animal cruelty cases, provided care andrehabilitations for 398 animals at our…

Animals
4
Noah's Animal House Foundation

To remove the "no pets allowed" sign on the doors of domestic violence shelters. women should not have to choose between leaving their abuser and leaving their pets behind to be abused.

Animals
5
Mercy for Animals Inc

Mercy for animals' mission is to construct a compassionate food system that is not just kind to animals but essential for the future of our planet and all who share it. our vision of a world where animals are respected, protected, and free…

Animals
6
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
7
Fauna & Flora International Usa Inc

Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.

Philanthropy
8
Four Paws International Inc

Our vision is a world where humans treat animals with respect, empathy and understanding. four paws mission is to be the strong, global and independent voice for animals.

Animals
9
Halo Helping Animals Live On Inc

Dog and cat rescue and rehousing; humane care and treatment of these animals.

Animals
10
Alaqua Animal Refuge Inc

To be a leading advocate for all animals, to maximize the healing power animals have on the human spirit, and to provide shelter, safety, and second chances to animals in need.

Animals
11
Celestial Zoo Pet Rescue

To help homeless pets find their forever home. it includes fostering, medicdal and microchipping them.

Animals
12
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Animal Nations Dba Redrover; the most unlike its peers is The Faith Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/45
Grantees still filing
33/45
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRIGHT STARS OF BETHLEHEM: $175,000 · OtherBRIGHT STARS OF BETHLEHEMBRIGTH STARS OF BETHLEHEM: $81,000 · OtherBRIGTH STARS OF BETHLEHEMGRACE PLACE: $69,000 · OtherGRACE PLACEMESSIAH LUTHERAN CHURCH: $67,000 · OtherMESSIAH LUTHERAN CHURCHCOMMUNITY ACTION STOPS ABUSE INC: $62,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION STOPS ABUSE INCBrights Stars of Bethlehem: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · Other+63 more: $246,735 · Other+63 moreHope International Ministries Inc: $70,000 · Human ServicesHope Internatio…METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesMETROPOLITAN MI…LUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES FUND: $21,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN CHURCH…HEALING HOUSE INC: $7,000 · Human Services+3 more: $4,550 · Human ServicesPHIL'S FRIENDS NFP: $99,000 · HealthPHIL'S FR…+3 more: $3,200 · HealthLEADACHILD SOCIETY: $71,000 · EducationLEADACHIL…GORDON PARKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $21,600 · EducationGORDON PA…+3 more: $4,200 · EducationHOPE INTERNATIONAL: $14,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $6,300 · InternationalMercy Ships International: $6,000 · InternationalCOMMUNITY LINC: $9,500 · Housing & ShelterREVELATION MEDIA INC: $3,000 · ReligionLUTHERAN BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC: $1,000 · Religion
Other$765,735Human Services$157,550Health$102,200Education$96,800International$26,300Housing & Shelter$9,500Religion$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPHIL'S FRIENDS NFP: $99,000 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetLEADACHILD SOCIETY: $71,000 over 6y, 7.3% of budgetHope International Ministries Inc: $70,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION STOPS ABUSE INC: $62,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $55,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUPLIFT: $21,600 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetGORDON PARKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $21,600 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES FUND: $21,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetZENON MINISTRIES INC: $18,000 over 4y, 7.0% of budgetHOPE INTERNATIONAL: $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY LINC: $9,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHEALING HOUSE INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $6,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIG CAT RESCUE CORP: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS MORE SOCIETY: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FEDERATION FOR CHILDREN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTARS & STRIPES 4 EVER FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetNATIONAL PEDIATRIC CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLION HABITAT RANCH INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE STAR SERVICE DOGS INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPeaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED ANIMAL NATIONS DBA REDROVER: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARA ELEPHANT PROJECT USA INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILING DOG FARMS: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUR CORNERS EQUINE RESCUE: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS OF HONOR INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT K9 HERO: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society of Tampa Bay Inc: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOST MEADOWS MULE REFUGE: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PHIL'S FRIENDS NFP ↗
  • Who funds LEADACHILD SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Hope International Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION STOPS ABUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds UPLIFT ↗
  • Who funds GORDON PARKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN CHURCH CHARITIES FUND ↗
  • Who funds ZENON MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY LINC ↗
  • Who funds HEALING HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds BIG CAT RESCUE CORP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Surendra and Karen Gupta Arc FoundationMO15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Surendra and Karen Gupta Arc Foundation · Seckinger Foundation Corporation · Servant Foundation · Edwin D Marks Animal Foundation · Joyce a Ward Foundation · Gat Family Foundation · John J Sullivan Jr Foundation John Houlehan & Mark Henke-Trustees · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Smith Fries Foundation Uti 111787 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Smith Fries Foundation Uti 111787. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Community Action Stops Abuse Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Ministries Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Smith Fries Foundation Uti 111787?

Find your warmest path to Smith Fries Foundation Uti 111787 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 92 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Smith Fries Foundation Uti 111787’s filings →

More from the funding graph