Skip to content

· Private foundation

Smf Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$351k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$590kHealth$572kPhilanthropy$333kHousing & Shelter$66kHuman Services$28kEducation$18kYouth Development$18kFood & Nutrition$10k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $333k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MCLEAN HOSPITAL$100,000
HEBREW SENIORLIFE$83,333
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$50,000
BROOKLINE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH$50,000
BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S$50,000
CHARLESTOWN BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$18,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%JEFF'S PLACE: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$971k · 6 repeat orgs$74k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$971k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+33%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BROOKLINE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH
    3× · 2022–2025 · $100k · revenue +80%
  • 2L
    2 LIFE COMMUNITIES
    4× · 2020–2024 · $66k · revenue +32%
  • BG
    BOSTON GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PSYCHOANALYSIS
    2× · 2020–2021 · $36k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • HF
    HOPE FOR LITTLE WANDERERS
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • WILLIAMS COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $18k · revenue +33%
  • BF
    BOSTON FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
2
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
3
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
6
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
7
Jewish Community Centers of Greater Boston

To advance the aspirations of families and individuals to enrich their lives, bodies and spirits, by providing the best in contemporary programs and experiences, informed by jewish values for today's jews and the people in their lives.

Human Services
8
Buckingham Browne & Nichols School

Bb&n, an all gender day school in cambridge, massachusetts, was established in 1974 by the merger of two independent schools, the buckingham school and the browne & nichols school, founded respectively in 1889 and 1883. located on multiple…

Education
9
Mass General Brigham Incorporated

Patient care, teaching, research and serving the community.

Health
10
The Brien Center for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services

The brien center provides a continuum of care for children, adolescents, adults and families living with significant and persistent mental health and substance use disorders. we are guided by the belief that everyone in berkshire county…

Health
11
Beth Israel Hospital & Children's Hospital Medical Care Corporation

Pediatric healthcare, education & research

—
12
Boston Library Consortium Inc

Boston library consortium, inc. (the organization or "blc") was incorporated in 1977 as amassachusetts not-for-profit corporation. blc is a library consortium serving public and privateuniversities, liberal arts colleges, state libraries,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brookline Community Mental Health Center Inc Dba the Brookline Center; the most unlike its peers is Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $590,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUNDMCLEAN HOSPITAL: $285,896 · OtherMCLEAN HOSPITALBRIGHAM & WOMEN'S: $150,000 · OtherBRIGHAM & WOMEN'SBROOKLINE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH: $100,000 · OtherBROOKLINE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY MENTAL H…HOPE FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $25,000 · Other+1 more: $10,000 · OtherHEBREW SENIORLIFE: $333,333 · PhilanthropyHEBREW SENIORLIFE2 LIFE COMMUNITIES: $66,000 · Housing & ShelterBOSTON GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PSYCHOANALYSIS: $35,750 · EducationWILLIAMS COLLEGE: $18,000 · EducationCHARLESTOWN BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $18,000 · Youth DevelopmentJEFF'S PLACE: $2,500 · Human Services
International$590,000Other$570,896Philanthropy$333,333Housing & Shelter$66,000Education$53,750Youth Development$18,000Human Services$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $590,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHEBREW SENIORLIFE: $333,333 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetBROOKLINE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH: $100,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budget2 LIFE COMMUNITIES: $66,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBOSTON GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PSYCHOANALYSIS: $35,750 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetWILLIAMS COLLEGE: $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLESTOWN BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEFF'S PLACE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW SENIORLIFE ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLINE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds 2 LIFE COMMUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PSYCHOANALYSIS ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAMS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CHARLESTOWN BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds JEFF'S PLACE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Smf Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Smf Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • 2LIFE Communities Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Hebrew Senior Life Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Williams College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Smf Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Smf Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Smf’s filings →

More from the funding graph