Skip to content

· Public charity

Small Business Association of Michigan

The SMALL BUSINESS ASSOCIATION OF MICHIGAN's mission is to help michigan small businesses succeed by promoting entrepreneurship, leveraging buying power and engaging in political advocacy.

$2.9M
Granted FY2021
275
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2021 · 275 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 275 grants below total $2,566,348, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,895,382 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $329,034 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k123 grants · $1.0M
  • $10k–50k152 grants · $1.5M
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RR HOLDINGS 1 LLC$15,000
ALEX & BECK LLC$15,000
TK FUND QOZB LLC$15,000
CITY OF TECUMSEH DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY$13,793
JIMEVA INC$10,000
K AND R RESTAURANT GROUP LLC DBA BENSTEIN GRILLE$10,000
MARIMO LLC O'S PUB & GRILL$10,000
THE ROYAL PUB INC$10,000
WABEEK HOSPITALITY LLC$10,000
FABIANO'S RIVER HOUSE BAR & GRILL$10,000
BELLA PIATTI LLC$10,000
BIERS INWOOD BREWERY LLC$10,000
KEWEENAW BREWING COMPANY$10,000
SMOKE & BARREL LLC$10,000
AJ'S WALLEYE LODGE BAR & GRILL$10,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 62% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BRAUEREI BECKER LLC: $10k → 5%BREW LLC: $10k → 7%KENNEDY WEAL INN INC: $10k → 8%BIERS INWOOD BREWERY LLC: $10k → 9%MOLASSES LLC: $10k → 9%CHARLOTTERISING: $10k → 9%MANCELONA MOOSE 2254: $10k → 9%NORTHERN UNITED BREWING COMPANY LLC: $10k → 10%KHNEMU STUDIO LLC DBA ROOT COFFEEHOUSE: $10k → 10%METAMORA 8 LLC: $10k → 10%BIRD CREEK FARMS: $10k → 12%SMYRNA TAVERN & TABLE LLC: $10k → 12%PRESIDENTIAL BREWING COMPANY LLC: $10k → 12%ALPHA BREWING COMPANY LLC: $10k → 13%ALEXANDERS PREMIER BANQUET FACILITY & CATERING: $10k → 13%NORTHERN TRAILS BAR & GRILLE LLC: $10k → 13%NEOPAPALIS OF ANN ARBOR LLC: $10k → 14%THE MEDALIST 19TH HOLE LLC: $10k → 14%AJ'S WALLEYE LODGE BAR & GRILL: $10k → 14%DAMAR ENTERPRISES INC: $10k → 14%AGRI-MED LLC: $10k → 15%PINE STUMP JUNCTION CE LLC: $10k → 16%CANADA CREEK RANCH ASSOCIATION INC: $10k → 16%PRAIRIE LAKE TAVERN LLC: $10k → 16%HANK'S BAR & GRILL LLC (HANK AND DONS): $10k → 16%SNOW SNAKE MT INC: $10k → 17%OAK POINTE INVESTMENTS LLC: $10k → 19%TK FUND QOZB LLC: $15k → 21%TRAVERSE CITY WHISKEY CO: $10k → 7%HOG WILD BARBECUE: $10k → 8%LONE STAR BBQ INC: $10k → 8%702 CLUB: $10k → 9%PRAY FUNERAL HOME INC: $10k → 9%ORIGINAL GRAVITY BREWING COMPANY: $10k → 10%BELTLINE PARTNERS INC: $10k → 11%DIGS LLC: $10k → 11%CITY OF TECUMSEH DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY: $14k → 12%FABIANO'S RIVER HOUSE BAR & GRILL: $10k → 12%DEW ENTERPRISE LLC: $10k → 13%REAL HOSPITALITY GROUP PEPPER JOE'S: $10k → 13%KEELUNG INC (DBA PEGASUS SPAS & LEISURE PRODUCTS): $10k → 13%TAVERN ON CENTER LLC: $10k → 14%CENTER ICE SKATE & SPORT: $10k → 14%FRANKENMUTH BREWING COMPANY: $10k → 18%MIGHION DETROIT LLC DBA HARBOR HOUSE GREEKTOWN: $10k → 21%OM CAFE TC LLC DBA THE PARLOR: $10k → 7%RR HOLDINGS 1 LLC: $15k → 16%ALEX & BECK LLC: $15k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saugatuck Yacht Club Sailing Program

Instruction on the safe use and operation of boats

Unclassified
2
South Shore Yacht Club

To develop and encourage competitive and recreational boating, sportsmanship, and boating safety on lake michigan.

—
3
Cedar Lake Yacht Club

Group boating activities, sailing school, and classes for members

—
4
Devils Lake Yacht Club

Operation of yacht club for members, and to provide goodwill between boat owners, property owners, and fishermen.

—
5
Whitemarsh Boat Club

To promote the sport of rowing

Education
6
Southwestern Yacht Club

Provide a location for the members' to persue their free association rights and further maritime education.

—
7
Detroit Yacht Club

We are a historic, private yacht club dedicated to providing a variety of outstanding dining, social, recreational and boating programs for our members, families and guests.

—
8
North Shore Country Club

A private membership country club providing golf, tennis, swimming, racquet sports, clubhouse and dining facilities for the social and recreational benefits of its members.

—
9
Marshall Golf Club

Allow members to golf and socialize

—
10
Oyster Bay Yacht Club Inc

To own and operate a private club for the recreation, pleasure and benefit of club members, their families and guests.

—
11
Sheboygan Yacht Club

Promote yachting, boating and social activities of club members.

—
12
Lake Geneva Yacht Club Inc

To create and maintain an institution with a world class level of competitive sailing that is instructional at all levels and maintain one of the countrys finest sailing racing facilities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sunseekers Boating Club Inc; the most unlike its peers is CharlotteRising. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 275 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

+197 more: $1,976,479 · Other+197 moreSUNSEEKERS BOATING CLUB INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsBELLEVILLE YACHT CLUB: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsCharlotteRising: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$1,976,479Recreation & Sports$20,000Community Improvement$10,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY CLUB OF MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCharlotteRising: $10,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetSUNSEEKERS BOATING CLUB INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetBELLEVILLE YACHT CLUB: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWAWONOWIN COUNTRY CLUB INC: $9,921 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY CLUB OF MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Michigan Municipal League FoundationMI24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 5 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Michigan Municipal League Foundation · The Right Place Inc · Ann Arbor Spark · Lakeshore Advantage Corporation · Detroit Economic Growth Association · Southwest Michigan First Corp · Lansing Economic Area Partnership

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Small Business Association of Michigan funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Small Business Association of Michigan. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 275 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Small Business Association of Michigan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph