Skip to content

· Public charity

Slovanic Benevolent Order of Texas #142

The purpose of this Society is to provide security for its members and the families of the insured, through the arious certificates issued in accordance with the fraternal insurance laws of the State of Texas.

$13k
Granted FY2018
10
Grants FY2018
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Health$4kEducation$4kYouth Development$1kPhilanthropy$1kFood & Nutrition$500Human Services$500Religion$250Other$0
02FY2018 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$845k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$8,000
SPJST YOUTH FUND$1,033
SPJST SCHOLARSHIP FUND$1,000
ST JUDES HOSPITAL$500
SHRINERS$500
TOYS FOR TOTS$500
INTERFAITH MINISTRIES$250
Individual grant recipient$250
HARRIS COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$250
TEXAS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–18) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 28% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CAMP KUBENA: $8k → 12%TEXAS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $500 → 16%ST JUDES HOSPITAL: $750 → 17%TOYS FOR TOTS: $500 → 7%TEXAS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $250 → 16%ST JUDES HOSPITAL: $500 → 17%TOYS FOR TOTS: $500 → 7%SHRINERS HOSPITAL: $1k → 16%SHRINERS: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9k · 7 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$9k
$2k

Still filing today

71%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
HealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SB
    SLAVONIC BENEVOLENT ORDER OF THE STATE OF TEXAS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $3k · revenue +88%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +120%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • BF
    BOOTS FOR TROOPS
    one grant, 2017 · $500
  • SF
    SPJST FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $500
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS
    one grant, 2017 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
5/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSLAVONIC BENEVOLENT ORDER OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: $3,000 · OtherSLAVONIC BENEVOLENT ORDER OF THE STATE OF TEXASSPJST YOUTH FUND: $1,033 · OtherSPJST YOUTH FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $750 · OtherHARRIS COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $750 · Other+5 more: $1,800 · Other+5 moreSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $1,500 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS F…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,250 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S R…Texas Children's Hospital: $750 · HealthTexas Children's Hos…MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$15,333Health$3,500Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSLAVONIC BENEVOLENT ORDER OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SLAVONIC BENEVOLENT ORDER OF THE STATE OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Slovanic Benevolent Order of Texas #142 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Slovanic Benevolent Order of Texas #142. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Slovanic Benevolent Order of Texas #142’s filings →

More from the funding graph