Skip to content

· Private foundation

Simpson Foundation Inc Uad 7232013

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Human Services$65kCivil Rights$60kHealth$35kHousing & Shelter$25kCommunity Improvement$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$10k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$746k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$10,000
NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$10,000
ACLU OF NEW JERSEY$10,000
NORWESCAP$5,000
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%NORWESCAP: $10k → 7%NORWESCAP: $5k → 7%NORWESCAP: $5k → 7%NORWESCAP: $5k → 7%BRIGID ALLIANCE: $5k → 17%BRIGID ALLIANCE: $5k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $5k → 17%BRIGID ALLIANCE: $5k → 17%CHARITY WATER: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$250k · 8 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +7% since the first grant, against -40% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
1

Total granted

$250k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
-40%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +7%
  • NN
    NORTHWEST NEW JERSEY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $25k · revenue +16%
  • TB
    THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
2
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
3
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
4
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
5
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
6
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
7
Center for Arms Control and

A nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to enhancing international peace and security in the 21st century, thereby retaining its focus on nuclear weapons but expanding to include other present emerging security threats.

International
8
West Side Center for Community Life

To pursue anti-hunger initiatives through the west side campaign against hunger (wscah) program whose mission is to alleviate hunger by ensuring that all new yorkers have access with dignity to a choice of healthy food and supportive…

Youth Development
9
Planned Parenthood of Northern Central and Southern New Jersey Inc

Planned parenthood of northern, central, and southern new jersey provides confidential, affordable, high-quality health care. we protect and promote the fundamental right of all individuals to make their own personal health decisions.…

Health
10
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
11
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
12
Global Poverty Project Inc

Our mission is to build a movement of global citizens whose actions will help achieve our vision of a world without extreme poverty.

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest New Jersey Community Action Program Inc; the most unlike its peers is Neighborhood Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $50,000 · OtherNEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INCACLU OF NEW JERSEY: $40,000 · OtherACLU OF NEW JERSEYHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONALNORTHWEST NEW JERSEY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST NEW JERSEY …THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE I…CHARITY GLOBAL INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesCHARITY GLOBAL INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $45,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD …SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $40,000 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVERTY …WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 · International
Other$115,000Human Services$50,000Health$45,000Crime & Legal$40,000International$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC: $50,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $45,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST NEW JERSEY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Simpson Foundation Inc Uad 7232013 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Simpson Foundation Inc Uad 7232013. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 38%
  • Northwest New Jersey Community Action Program Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Neighborhood Center Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Simpson Foundation Inc Uad 7232013’s filings →

More from the funding graph