Skip to content

· Public charity

Silicon Valley Campaign for Legal Services

To raise and distribute funds for provision of legal services for disadvantaged individuals

$80k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$1.7M
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$42k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN MATEO CNTY$10,000
K & G ALEXANDER COMM LAW CTR$10,000
PRO BONO PROJECT SILICON VALLEY$10,000
SENIOR ADULT LEGAL ASSISTANCE$10,000
LAW FOUNDATION OF SILICON VALLEY$10,000
COMMUNITY LEGAL SVCS-EPALO ALTO$10,000
SANTA CLARA CNTY ASIAN LAW ALLIANCE$10,000
BAY AREA LEGAL AID$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN MATEO CNTY: $34k → 7%K & G ALEXANDER COMM LAW CTR: $34k → 8%BAY AREA LEGAL AID: $34k → 10%LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN MATEO CNTY: $31k → 7%K & G ALEXANDER COMM LAW CTR: $31k → 8%BAY AREA LEGAL AID: $31k → 10%LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN MATEO CNTY: $29k → 7%K & G ALEXANDER COMM LAW CTR: $29k → 8%BAY AREA LEGAL AID: $29k → 10%LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN MATEO CNTY: $26k → 7%K & G ALEXANDER COMM LAW CTR: $26k → 8%BAY AREA LEGAL AID: $26k → 10%LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN MATEO CNTY: $26k → 7%K & G ALEXANDER COMM LAW CTR: $26k → 8%BAY AREA LEGAL AID: $26k → 10%LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN MATEO CNTY: $24k → 7%K & G ALEXANDER COMM LAW CTR: $24k → 8%BAY AREA LEGAL AID: $24k → 10%LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN MATEO CNTY: $16k → 7%K & G ALEXANDER COMM LAW CTR: $16k → 8%BAY AREA LEGAL AID: $16k → 10%LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN MATEO CNTY: $12k → 7%K & G ALEXANDER COMM LAW CTR: $12k → 8%BAY AREA LEGAL AID: $12k → 10%SANTA CLARA CNTY ASIAN LAW ALLIANCE: $34k → 8%SENIOR ADULT LEGAL ASSISTANCE: $34k → 8%SANTA CLARA CNTY ASIAN LAW ALLIANCE: $31k → 8%SENIOR ADULT LEGAL ASSISTANCE: $31k → 8%SANTA CLARA CNTY ASIAN LAW ALLIANCE: $29k → 8%SENIOR ADULT LEGAL ASSISTANCE: $29k → 8%SANTA CLARA CNTY ASIAN LAW ALLIANCE: $26k → 8%SENIOR ADULT LEGAL ASSISTANCE: $26k → 8%SANTA CLARA CNTY ASIAN LAW ALLIANCE: $26k → 8%SENIOR ADULT LEGAL ASSISTANCE: $26k → 8%SANTA CLARA CNTY ASIAN LAW ALLIANCE: $24k → 8%SENIOR ADULT LEGAL ASSISTANCE: $24k → 8%SENIOR ADULT LEGAL ASSISTANCE: $16k → 8%SANTA CLARA CNTY ASIAN LAW ALLIANCE: $16k → 8%SANTA CLARA CNTY ASIAN LAW ALLIANCE: $12k → 8%SENIOR ADULT LEGAL ASSISTANCE: $12k → 8%COMMUNITY LEGAL SVCS-EPALO ALTO: $34k → 8%COMMUNITY LEGAL SVCS-EPALO ALTO: $31k → 8%COMMUNITY LEGAL SVCS-EPALO ALTO: $29k → 8%COMMUNITY LEGAL SVCS-EPALO ALTO: $26k → 8%COMMUNITY LEGAL SVCS-EPALO ALTO: $26k → 8%COMMUNITY LEGAL SVCS-EPALO ALTO: $24k → 8%COMMUNITY LEGAL SVCS-EPALO ALTO: $16k → 8%COMMUNITY LEGAL SVCS-EPALO ALTO: $12k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 8 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
0

Total granted

$1.7M
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Crime & LegalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SENIOR ADULTS LEGAL ASSISTANCE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $208k · revenue +42%
  • LF
    Law Foundation of Silicon Valley
    9× · 2017–2025 · $208k · revenue +19%
  • LA
    Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County
    9× · 2017–2025 · $208k · revenue +85%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area

    As one of the most enduring civil rights institutions on the West Coast, we work to dismantle systems of oppression and racism, and build an equitable and just society.

    —
    2
    Legal Link

    Legal Link removes legal barriers that prolong poverty by adding critically needed capacity to the legal ecosystem.

    Crime & Legal
    3
    Collective Legal Services Eviction Defense Center

    Legal Aid

    Crime & Legal
    4
    Legal Assistance to the Elderly

    LAE's mission is to protect and advance the right of San Franciscos seniors and adults with disabilities to be housed, healthy, financially stable, and safe. We provide free legal services to San Francisco seniors and adults with…

    Crime & Legal
    5
    Legal Aid Foundation of Santa Barbara County

    To provide high-quality civil legal services to vulnerable santa barbara county residents.

    Crime & Legal
    6
    La Raza Centro Legal - San Francisco

    La Raza Centro Legal San Francisco provides high quality, highly trusted, free legal services to low-income or immigrant clients in the San Francisco Bay Area.

    —
    7
    Inner City Law Center

    In 2024, Inner City Law Center, ICLC, served over 3,400 people, helping vulnerable Angelenos to remain in their homes and recover nearly $20.5 million in financial benefits.

    Crime & Legal
    8
    Southern California Immigration Project

    Southern California Immigration Project is a public interest nonprofit organization dedicated to providing pro bono legal services to survivors of human and civil rights violations.

    International
    9
    Legal Aid of Marin

    To provide access to the civil justice system through quality legal services, encompassing practical solutions, to low income, vulnerable and otherwise underserved residents of marin county.

    Crime & Legal
    10
    Alameda County Homeless Action Center

    HAC assists homeless and mentally ill clients in the long and difficult process of becoming eligible for SSI and MediCal benefits. HAC provides assistance with other public benefits that clients need in the interim to survive until their…

    Housing & Shelter
    11
    All for the Family Legal Clinic Inc

    Providing low cost and free legal assistance to low income residents of the Bay Area in the areas of family law restraining orders basic immigration uncontested probate and basic immigration issues

    Crime & Legal
    12
    Silicon Valley Campaign for Legal Services

    To raise and distribute funds for provision of legal services for disadvantaged individuals

    Crime & Legal
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Senior Adults Legal Assistance; the most unlike its peers is Bay Area Legal Aid. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    7/8
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    SENIOR ADULTS LEGAL ASSISTANCE: $207,500 · Crime & LegalSENIOR ADULTS LEGAL ASSISTANCECommunity Legal Services in East Palo Alto Inc: $207,500 · Crime & LegalCommunity Legal Services in East Palo Alto IncLaw Foundation of Silicon Valley: $207,500 · Crime & LegalLaw Foundation of Silicon ValleyLegal Aid Society of San Mateo County: $207,500 · Crime & LegalLegal Aid Society of San Mateo CountyBAY AREA LEGAL AID: $207,500 · OtherBAY AREA LEGAL AIDSANTA CLARA COUNTY ASIAN LAW ALLIANCE: $207,500 · OtherSANTA CLARA COUNTY ASIAN LAW ALLIANCEPRO BONO PROJECT SILICON VALLEY: $207,500 · OtherPRO BONO PROJECT SILICON VALLEYPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $207,500 · EducationPRESIDENT-BOAR…
    Crime & Legal$830,000Other$622,500Education$207,500

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSENIOR ADULTS LEGAL ASSISTANCE: $207,500 over 9y, 4.6% of budgetCommunity Legal Services in East Palo Alto Inc: $207,500 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetLaw Foundation of Silicon Valley: $207,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetLegal Aid Society of San Mateo County: $207,500 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetBAY AREA LEGAL AID: $207,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetSANTA CLARA COUNTY ASIAN LAW ALLIANCE: $207,500 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $207,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPRO BONO PROJECT SILICON VALLEY: $207,500 over 9y, 5.1% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds SENIOR ADULTS LEGAL ASSISTANCE ↗
    • Who funds Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto Inc ↗
    • Who funds Law Foundation of Silicon Valley ↗
    • Who funds Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County ↗
    • Who funds BAY AREA LEGAL AID ↗
    • Who funds SANTA CLARA COUNTY ASIAN LAW ALLIANCE ↗
    • Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE ↗
    • Who funds PRO BONO PROJECT SILICON VALLEY ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA17.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati Foundation · The Morrison & Foerster Foundation · Sunlight Giving · Littler Mendelson Foundation Inc Attn Tax Manager · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Perkins Coie Foundation · Equal Justice Works · The Sobrato Family Foundation · The Heising-Simons Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Silicon Valley Campaign for Legal Services funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Silicon Valley Campaign for Legal Services. Bigger dots raise more.

    2023
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Silicon Valley Campaign for Legal Services’ filings →

      More from the funding graph