Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sidney Stern Memorial Fund Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$69k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$124kHuman Services$104kAnimals$69kPhilanthropy$42kEnvironment$33kEducation$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$4,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$991k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASPCA$10,000
JEWISH ORPHANS HOME$8,000
MY STUFF BAGS FOUNDATION$7,000
BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA$6,000
BREATHE CALIFORNIA OF LA$5,000
MARCH OF DIMES$5,000
CITY OF HOPE$4,000
NATIONAL JEWISH HOSPITAL$4,000
JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC$4,000
WAGS & WALKS$4,000
HEARTS & BONES ANIMAL RESCUE$3,000
UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE$3,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES$3,000
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO CANCER CTR FUND$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $6k → 14%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $6k → 14%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $5k → 14%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $4k → 14%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $4k → 14%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $4k → 14%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $4k → 14%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$336k · 15 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
2

Total granted

$336k
$5k

Still filing today

47%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BI
    BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $36k · revenue +146%
  • MS
    MY STUFF BAGS FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $33k · revenue +78%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $31k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY DISASTER FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
2
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
3
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc

Protection of animal rights

Animals
4
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
5
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
6
Four Paws International Inc

Our vision is a world where humans treat animals with respect, empathy and understanding. four paws mission is to be the strong, global and independent voice for animals.

Animals
7
Hope for China Dogs Rescue

At Hope for China Dogs, we are committed to combating the cruel and inhumane practice of the dog meat trade in China. We believe that every dog deserves to live a life free from pain and suffering, and we are dedicated to rescuing and…

Animals
8
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
9
Jet Wag Animal Rescue Inc

Our mission is to move adoptable dogs and cats primarily from heavily-burdened areas to loving homes. We work with trusted partners throughout the country and around the world and facilitate vet care, transport, and adoptions to help…

Animals
10
600 Million Stray Dogs Need You Corporation

To end the #1 cause of suffering and death for dogs and cats globally, by developing food that will spay and neuter them, without surgery and end the overpopulation problem without killing.

Animals
11
No Dogs Left Behind
Animals
12
San Diego Humane Society and Spca

Create a more humane world by inspiring compassion, providing hope and advancing the welfare of animals and people.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hearts & Bones Animal Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH ORPHANS HOME: $44,000 · OtherJEWISH ORPHANS HOMEBREATHE CALIFORNIA OF LA: $32,500 · OtherBREATHE CALIFORNIA OF LACITY OF HOPE: $27,000 · OtherCITY OF HOPENATIONAL JEWISH HOSPITAL: $26,100 · OtherNATIONAL JEWISH HOSPITALUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO CANCER CTR FUND: $18,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO CANCER CTR FUNDAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR SPCA: $15,000 · OtherAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR SPCA+4 more: $16,300 · Other+4 moreTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $31,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SO…Humane World for Animals Inc: $12,500 · AnimalsHumane World fo…HEARTS & BONES ANIMAL RESCUE: $5,500 · AnimalsHEARTS & BONES …Wags and Walks: $4,000 · AnimalsWags and WalksMARCH OF DIMES INC: $31,500 · HealthMARCH OF DIME…CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $12,500 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI …BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $36,100 · Human ServicesBRAILLE IN…THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH…UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $16,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY…MY STUFF BAGS FOUNDATION: $33,000 · EducationMY STUFF …
Other$178,900Animals$53,000Health$44,000Human Services$36,100Philanthropy$36,000Education$33,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $36,100 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMY STUFF BAGS FOUNDATION: $33,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $31,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $31,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $20,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $12,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTS & BONES ANIMAL RESCUE: $5,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds MY STUFF BAGS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HEARTS & BONES ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds Wags and Walks ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sidney Stern Memorial Fund Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sidney Stern Memorial Fund Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sidney Stern Memorial Fund Tr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph