Skip to content

· Private foundation

Shumaker Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$49k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$43kRecreation & Sports$35kSocial Science$18kCommunity Improvement$16kYouth Development$10kFood & Nutrition$8kReligion$7kHealth$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PATRON OF THE ARTS IN THE VATICAN$10,000
GROSSE POINTE CHAMBER FOUNDATION$6,000
GIRLS ACTIVELY PARTICIPATING$5,000
CLIMB WYOMING$5,000
FILM FORUM$5,000
MUSIC LAND$5,000
TCSAR FOUNDATION$5,000
CITY MEALS ON WHEELS$5,000
JACKSON HOLE SKI CLUB$2,500
Individual grant recipient$900
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%CLIMB WYOMING: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$87k · 5 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +216% since the first grant, against -47% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
12

Total granted

$87k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+216%
-47%

Still filing today

40%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THE PATRONS OF THE ARTS IN THE VATICAN MUSEUMS INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $23k · revenue +216%
  • HI
    HOLLEY INSTITUTE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $18k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $16k

Funded once

  • BM
    BAYVIEW MACKINAC RACE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF WEE WAH PARK
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • RU
    RACQUET UP DETROIT
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -47%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Denver Film Society

The mission of the denver film society is to develop opportunities for diverse audiences to discover film through creative, thought-provoking experiences. we strive to cultivate and celebrate film as an art form; to enrich and expand the…

Arts & Culture
2
Junior League of the City of New York Inc

The junior league of the city of new york, inc., is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration, and training.

Community Improvement
3
Masters School

The masters school celebrates active participation, deep understanding, and meaningful connection. a community of diverse individuals, we gather to learn, to strive, to dare, to do - to be a power for good in the world.

—
4
San Francisco Jazz Organization

The san francisco jazz organization (the organization) is a recognized international leader in jazz creation, presentation, and education. the organization explores the full spectrum of jazz, from the music's origins in the african…

Arts & Culture
5
United States Golf Association

The united states golf association champions and advances the game of golf. it serves millions of golfers and thousands of golf courses both within the united states and around the world through programs and services that promote a…

Recreation & Sports
6
Juxtaposition Arts Inc

Juxtaposition arts (jxta) is a visual art and design organization, rooted in north minneapolis for over 30 years. we expand access to creative education and career pathways by engaging emerging artisits in rigorous traning, mentorship and…

Youth Development
7
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
8
The City Club of Cleveland

The city club of cleveland's mission is to create conversations of consequence that help democracy thrive. we do this in pursuit of our vision of strong, informed individuals and communities that prize freedom of speech and civil, civic…

Education
9
Greater Columbus Arts Council

Mission: to champion and elevate the arts and cultural expression of greater columbus.vision: power of art realized. people engaged. city energized.

Arts & Culture
10
Vail International Pro Am
Recreation & Sports
11
World Senior Games Inc World Senior Games Inc

Event. athletes are invited to attend a friendship festival, the opening ceremonies and parade of athletes, concerts and hall of fame. as a result of these efforts to promote camaraderie, we have discovered that while almost all of our…

—
12
New York Academy of Art

The new york academy of art is a unique graduate school that combines intensive technical training in the fine arts with active critical discourse. we believe that rigorously trained artists are best able to realize their artistic vision.…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Racquet Up Detroit; the most unlike its peers is The Patrons of the Arts in the Vatican Museums Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
1/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BAYVIEW MACKINAC RACE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherBAYVIEW MACKINAC RACE FOUNDATIONHOLLEY INSTITUTE: $17,500 · OtherHOLLEY INSTITUTEIndividual grant recipient: $16,125 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMUSIC LAND: $15,000 · OtherMUSIC LANDFRIENDS OF WEE WAH PARK: $5,000 · OtherTCSAR FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherNEWYORK-PRESBYTERIAN: $5,000 · Other+8 more: $7,425 · Other+8 moreTHE PATRONS OF THE ARTS IN THE VATICAN MUSEUMS INC: $22,800 · Arts & CultureTHE PATRONS OF THE …FILM FORUM INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureFILM FORUM INCGROSSE POINTE CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $16,000 · Community ImprovementGROSSE POIN…RACQUET UP DETROIT: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsJACKSON HOLE SKI & SNOWBOARD CLUB: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $5,000 · Food & NutritionGIRLS ACTIVELY PARTICIPATING: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentCLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$96,050Arts & Culture$27,800Community Improvement$16,000Recreation & Sports$7,500Food & Nutrition$5,000Youth Development$5,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE PATRONS OF THE ARTS IN THE VATICAN MUSEUMS INC: $22,800 over 3y, 11% of budgetGROSSE POINTE CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetFILM FORUM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRACQUET UP DETROIT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS ACTIVELY PARTICIPATING: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJACKSON HOLE SKI & SNOWBOARD CLUB: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE PATRONS OF THE ARTS IN THE VATICAN MUSEUMS INC ↗
  • Who funds GROSSE POINTE CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FILM FORUM INC ↗
  • Who funds RACQUET UP DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS ACTIVELY PARTICIPATING ↗
  • Who funds CLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON HOLE SKI & SNOWBOARD CLUB ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shumaker Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shumaker Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Shumaker Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph