Skip to content

Texas · Private foundation

Shoreview and Sugar Land Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
5
Grants FY2025
3
Organizations funded FY2024
67%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$3,500
Largest grant, FY2025
$12,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 3
FY2022 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$702k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 67% of the organizations Shoreview and Sugar Land Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 77% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
EducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving5$22k80%
FY20243$5k67%
FY20232$2k50%
FY20222$29kn/a
92% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$46kCommunity Improvement$7kYouth Development$4kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
University of Pittsburgh$43,20040%
Eastern Stars Community Association$3,5001n/a
Clemence Youth Foundation$3,5001n/a
Terrific Town$5001n/a
University of Minnesota Foundation$30010%
PTA Minnesota Congress 030530 Kimberly Lane Elementary PTA$9010%

Plus 3 recipients with no EIN on record ($6k), not named here.

Compare Shoreview and Sugar Land Foundation with peer funders

About Shoreview and Sugar Land Foundation

How much does Shoreview and Sugar Land Foundation give?
Shoreview and Sugar Land Foundation reported 5 grants totaling $21,710 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 3 organizations a year over FY2022 to FY2024.
What does Shoreview and Sugar Land Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (80%), Community Improvement (12%), Youth Development (7%).
Who are Shoreview and Sugar Land Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2025: University of Pittsburgh ($43k), Eastern Stars Community Association ($4k), Clemence Youth Foundation ($4k).
Does Shoreview and Sugar Land Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 67% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Shoreview and Sugar Land Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Where is Shoreview and Sugar Land Foundation based?
Shoreview and Sugar Land Foundation is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Shoreview and Sugar Land’s filings →

More from the funding graph