Skip to content
Shickley Community Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Community foundation

Shickley Community Foundation Inc

The shickley community foundation was established to provide funding for community improvement projects of the future.

$191k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$159kCommunity Improvement$129kMembership Benefit$122kHuman Services$52kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kHealth$19kArts & Culture$17kPhilanthropy$16kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $82,016, the rows itemized in this filing. The $191,048 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $109,032 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $53k
$9,300
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARY'S CEMETERY$37,000
SHICKLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC$15,616
Individual grant recipient$9,300
SONS OF AMERICAN LEGION SQUADRON #164$8,000
FILLMORE COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$6,250
SHICKLEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$5,850
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FILLMORE COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $13k → 9%BRUNING-DAVENPORTSHICKLEY YOUTH SPORTS: $6k → 11%NEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $11k → 13%BRODIN STUDIOS INC: $17k → 11%SONS OF AMERICAN LEGION SQUADRON #164: $8k → 14%FILLMORE CO AG SOCIETY: $8k → 9%SHICKLEY SONS OF AMERICAN LEGION: $21k → 13%FILLMORE CO YOUTH COALITION: $7k → 9%SHICKLEY SONS OF AMERICAN LEGION: $20k → 13%FILLMORE COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $6k → 9%BIG LITTLE TOWN REVITALIZATION CLUB: $65k → 9%ST MARY'S CEMETERY: $37k → 9%SWEDISH CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $30k → 9%SHICKLEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $28k → 9%SHICKLEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $25k → 9%SHICKLEY CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $22k → 9%BIG LITTLE TOWN REVITALIZATION CLUB: $22k → 9%SHICKLEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $22k → 9%SHICKLEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $21k → 9%SHICKLEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $20k → 9%BIG LITTLE TOWN REVITALIZATION CLUB: $16k → 9%SHICKLEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $16k → 9%SHICKLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $16k → 9%SHICKLEY CEMETERY ASSN: $14k → 9%SHICKLEY SONS OF AMERICAN LEGION: $11k → 9%SHICKLEY SONS OF AMERICAN LEGION: $11k → 9%BIG LITTLE TOWN REVITALIZATION CLUB: $11k → 9%AMERICAN LEGION POST #164: $10k → 9%SHICKLEY FIRE DISTRICT: $10k → 9%SHICKLEY FIRE DISTRICT: $10k → 9%SHICKLEY FIRE DISTRICT: $10k → 9%SHICKLEY FIRE DISTRICT: $10k → 9%SHICKLEY FIRE DISTRICT: $10k → 9%VILLAGE OF SHICKLEY: $9k → 9%ST MARY'S CEMETERY: $9k → 9%VIRGIL BIEGERT PUBLIC LIBRARY: $6k → 9%SHICKLEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $6k → 9%SHICKLEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $6k → 9%SHICKLEY CEMETARY ASSOCIATION: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$433k · 6 repeat orgs$169k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
11

Total granted

$433k
$136k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+11%

Still filing today

33%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SHICKLEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $142k
  • BL
    BIG LITTLE TOWN REVITALIZATION CLUB
    4× · 2020–2023 · $114k · revenue 0% · 50% of their budget
  • SS
    SHICKLEY SONS OF AMERICAN LEGION
    4× · 2017–2021 · $63k

Funded once

  • SC
    SWEDISH CEMETERY ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • SC
    SHICKLEY CEMETARY ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2017 · $22k
  • BS
    BRODIN STUDIOS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $17k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
1/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHICKLEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $142,100 · OtherSHICKLEY PUBLIC SCHOOLSSHICKLEY SONS OF AMERICAN LEGION: $63,094 · OtherSHICKLEY SONS OF AMERICAN LEGIONIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST MARY'S CEMETERY: $45,850 · OtherST MARY'S CEMETERYSWEDISH CEMETERY ASSOCIATION: $30,000 · OtherSWEDISH CEMETERY ASSOCIATIONSHICKLEY CEMETARY ASSOCIATION: $22,135 · OtherBRODIN STUDIOS INC: $16,500 · OtherSHICKLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $15,616 · Other+9 more: $73,749 · Other+9 moreBIG LITTLE TOWN REVITALIZATION CLUB: $113,550 · Community ImprovementBIG LITTLE TOWN REVIT…FILLMORE COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $18,750 · HealthNEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $11,299 · Education
Other$459,044Community Improvement$113,550Health$18,750Education$11,299

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBIG LITTLE TOWN REVITALIZATION CLUB: $113,550 over 4y, 50% of budgetFILLMORE COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $18,750 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetNEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $11,299 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BIG LITTLE TOWN REVITALIZATION CLUB ↗
  • Who funds FILLMORE COUNTY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shickley Community Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shickley Community Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Shickley Community Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Shickley Community Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Shickley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home