Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sherrill-Kenwood Community Chest Inc

COLLECTING AND REDISTRIBUTING DONATIONS Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$432k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHERRILL YOUTH PROGRAMS$5,000
ONEIDA COMMUNITY MANSION HOUSE$2,500
VVS EDUC FDN-DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS$2,000
VVS PERFORMING ARTS BOOSTER$1,500
NOYES MANOR TENANTS ASSN$1,500
SHERRILLVVS LITTLE LEAGUE$1,000
MADISON COUNTY CHILDRENS CAMP$1,000
KEYS PROGRAM$1,000
JUNIOR GOLF PROGRAM$1,000
SPIRIT OF HOPE CATHOLIC COMM CTR$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
ONEIDA AREA DAYCARE$1,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ONEIDA COMMUNITY MANSION HOUSE: $3k → 11%VVS PERFORMING ARTS BOOSTER: $2k → 16%MADISON COUNTY CHILDRENS CAMP: $1k → 11%SHERRILL YOUTH PROGRAMS: $5k → 16%ONEIDA AREA DAYCARE: $1k → 11%VVS EDUC FDN-DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS: $2k → 16%SPIRIT OF HOPE CATHOLIC COMM CTR: $1k → 11%NOYES MANOR TENANTS ASSN: $2k → 16%JUNIOR GOLF PROGRAM: $1k → 11%SHERRILLVVS LITTLE LEAGUE: $1k → 16%WANDERERS REST: $1k → 11%KEYS PROGRAM: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
0/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHERRILL YOUTH PROGRAMS: $5,000 · OtherSHERRILL YOUTH PROGRAMSVVS EDUC FDN-DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARS: $2,000 · OtherVVS EDUC FDN-DOLLARS FOR SCHOLARSNOYES MANOR TENANTS ASSN: $1,500 · OtherNOYES MANOR TENANTS ASSNVVS PERFORMING ARTS BOOSTERS: $1,500 · OtherVVS PERFORMING ARTS BOOSTERSJUNIOR GOLF PROGRAM: $1,000 · OtherJUNIOR GOLF PROGRAMIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientONEIDA AREA DAYCARE: $1,000 · OtherONEIDA AREA DAYCARESHERRILLVVS LITTLE LEAGUE: $1,000 · OtherSHERRILLVVS LITTLE LEAGUESPIRIT OF HOPE CATHOLIC COMM CTR: $1,000 · OtherSPIRIT OF HOPE CATHOLIC COMM CTRONEIDA COMMUNITY MANSION HOUSE: $2,500 · Arts & CultureONEIDA COMMUNITY MAN…KEYS CORP: $1,000 · Arts & CultureKEYS CORPMADISON COUNTY CHILDRENS CAMP INC: $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$15,000Arts & Culture$3,500Recreation & Sports$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetONEIDA COMMUNITY MANSION HOUSE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKEYS CORP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMADISON COUNTY CHILDRENS CAMP INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ONEIDA COMMUNITY MANSION HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds KEYS CORP ↗
  • Who funds MADISON COUNTY CHILDRENS CAMP INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sherrill-Kenwood Community Chest Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sherrill-Kenwood Community Chest Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sherrill-Kenwood Community Chest’s filings →

    More from the funding graph