Skip to content

· Private foundation

Shemen Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$37k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
0170% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$383kPhilanthropy$118kHuman Services$5kEducation$4kYouth Development$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $25,097, the rows itemized in this filing. The $36,718 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $11,621 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$73k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION TOLDOS YAAKOV YOSEF$16,000
KOLEL SHOMREI HACHOMOS OF JERUSALEM$2,500
DONORS FUND INC$2,000
CONG NER YISROEL$1,876
Individual grant recipient$1,414
KEREN HATZEDAKA$1,307
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%KEREN HATZEDAKA: $2k → 11%KEREN HATZEDAKA: $2k → 11%KEREN HATZEDAKA: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$242k · 13 repeat orgs$180k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
33

Total granted

$242k
$178k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+7%

Still filing today

31%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionInternationalRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KH
    KEREN HATZEDAKA INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $5k · revenue +6%
  • TF
    TZUR FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $4k · revenue +28%
  • TT
    TALMUD TORAH BAIS AVROHOM INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $4k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • KM
    KAHAL MEKOR CHAIM
    one grant, 2020 · $45k
  • CS
    CONGREGATION SHEMEN LMINCHA INC
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OHR SOMAYACH INC
    one grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue -66% · 36% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
2
Yeshivas Ohr Hatorah Inc

Operation of a parochial elementary school, providing education services to students

Education
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yehuda Inc

Providing religious and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
4
Yeshiva Nesivos Hatorah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
5
Cheder Shiras Hatorah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
6
Yeshivas Toras Zev Inc

The purpose of this organization is to support indigent torah scholars and their families by providing stipends and additional funds at jewish holiday times.

Religion
7
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
8
Yeshivat Or Hachaim of Lakewood Inc

Parochial elementary school with a focus on sephardic tradition.

Education
9
Tzohar Halev Inc

Support of tzohar-a school for special needs children located in israel

Education
10
Yeshiva Shaar Hatalmud

Providing jewish education to high school age students.

Education
11
Tiferes Yisroel Inc

The organization operates an elementary school with the goal of achieving academic excellence and personal growth.

Philanthropy
12
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tiferes Bais Yaakov Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Ohr Somayach Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION TOLDOS YAKOV YOSEF: $104,800 · OtherCONGREGATION TOLDOS YAKOV YOSEFCONGREGATION NER YISROEL INC: $65,286 · OtherCONGREGATION NER YISROEL INCKAHAL MEKOR CHAIM: $45,300 · OtherKAHAL MEKOR CHAIMCONGREGATION SHEMEN LMINCHA INC: $15,000 · Other+32 more: $125,659 · Other+32 moreDONORS FUND INC: $117,590 · PhilanthropyDONORS FUND INCBNOS ORCHOS CHAIM INC: $10,000 · EducationTIFERES BAIS YAAKOV INC: $5,000 · EducationBAIS TOVA INC: $4,250 · EducationTALMUD TORAH BAIS AVROHOM INC: $4,000 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $9,783 · InternationalKolel Shomre Hachomos of Jerusalem Inc: $9,500 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF OHR SOMAYACH INC: $11,750 · ReligionTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $4,174 · ReligionKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $5,267 · Human ServicesCHARIDY INC: $1,811 · Youth DevelopmentGOVOAH SPECIAL PROJECTS INC: $1,048 · Recreation & Sports
Other$356,045Philanthropy$117,590Education$23,250International$19,283Religion$15,924Human Services$5,267Youth Development$1,811Recreation & Sports$1,048

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONORS FUND INC: $117,590 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF OHR SOMAYACH INC: $11,750 over 1y, 36% of budgetBNOS ORCHOS CHAIM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $9,783 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKolel Shomre Hachomos of Jerusalem Inc: $9,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $5,267 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTIFERES BAIS YAAKOV INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBAIS TOVA INC: $4,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $4,174 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTALMUD TORAH BAIS AVROHOM INC: $4,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCHARIDY INC: $1,811 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetYESHIVA TIFERES TORAH INC: $1,075 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOVOAH SPECIAL PROJECTS INC: $1,048 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONORS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OHR SOMAYACH INC ↗
  • Who funds BNOS ORCHOS CHAIM INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC ↗
  • Who funds Kolel Shomre Hachomos of Jerusalem Inc ↗
  • Who funds KEREN HATZEDAKA INC ↗
  • Who funds TIFERES BAIS YAAKOV INC ↗
  • Who funds BAIS TOVA INC ↗
  • Who funds TZUR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TALMUD TORAH BAIS AVROHOM INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARIDY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY32.6× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Donors Fund Inc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Fund for Life Foundation Inc · Greenzweig Family Foundation · The Sorala Foundation · Mns Foundation · CCG Foundation a NJ Nonprofit Corporation · Igcf Inc · Chaim Maleh Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shemen Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shemen Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Tiferes Bais Yaakov Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Bais Tova Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Tiferes Torah Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Shemen’s filings →

More from the funding graph