Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Sheltering Arms Hospital

The mission of sheltering arms is to provide community based programs, to support a continuum of physical rehabilitation services and engage in community partnerships that enhance human ability.

$5.9M
Granted FY2022
3
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182022.

Health$16MCommunity Improvement$6k
02FY2022 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $2,974,856 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,896,860 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,922,004 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
  • $250k+2 grants · $3.0M
$1,346,361
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHELTERING ARMS HOSPITAL SOUTH$1,616,995
SHELTERING ARMS FOUNDATION$1,346,361
PALMYRA REHABILITATION CORPORATION$11,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 1% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SHELTERING ARMS CORPORATION: $10.3M → 5%THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION SERVING RICHMOND AND CENTRAL VIRGINIA: $150k → 9%SENIORNAVIGATORORG: $6k → 22%SHELTERING ARMS FOUNDATION: $2.1M → 5%AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION: $21k → 9%SHELTERING ARMS HOSPITAL SOUTH: $1.6M → 5%NATIONAL MS SOCIETY: $6k → 9%SHELTERING ARMS FOUNDATION: $1.3M → 5%SHELTERING ARMS HOSPITAL SOUTH: $213k → 5%PALMYRA REHABILITATION CORPORATION: $159k → 5%PALMYRA REHABILITATION CORPORATION: $16k → 5%PALMYRA REHABILITATION CORPORATION: $12k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

34%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.5M · 3 repeat orgs$10M to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$5.5M
$10M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-83%
-11%

Still filing today

67%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22
HealthCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SHELTERING ARMS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $3.5M · revenue -83%
  • SA
    SHELTERING ARMS HOSPITAL SOUTH INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $1.8M · revenue -98% · 87% of their budget
  • PR
    PALMYRA REHABILITATION CORPORATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $186k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • SA
    SHELTERING ARMS CORPORATION
    2× · 2018–2021 · $10M · revenue -38% · 41% of their budget
  • BS
    Bon Secours Richmond Healthcare Foundation
    2× · 2017–2018 · $150k · revenue -39%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $21k · revenue +26%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sheltering Arms Hospital

The mission of sheltering arms is to provide community based programs, to support a continuum of physical rehabilitation services and engage in community partnerships that enhance human ability.

Health
2
Vcu Health Tappahannock Hospital

To deliver important healthcare services with exceptional quality and patient-centered care.

Health
3
The Alexandria Hospital Foundation

Fundraising to support inova alexandria hospital, an acute care tax exempt hospital.

4
Chesapeake Hospital Corporation

The organization operates an acute care general hospital. The hospital has a community based Board of Directors, has an open medical staff, operates an emergency room providing care to all regardless of ability to pay, and provides…

5
Bon Secours - Richmond Health System Inc

The mission is to bring compassion to health care and to be good to those in need, especially those who are poor and dying. as a system of caregivers, we commit ourselves to help bring people and communities to health and wholeness.

Health
6
Appalachian Regional Medical Associates Inc

To promote community health through the provision of health care services to the citizens and residents of watauga, avery, and ashe counties, nc, and surrounding counties.

Health
7
Bon Secours - St Francis Medical Center Inc

The mission is to bring compassion to health care and to be good help to those in need, especially those who are poor and dying. As a system of caregivers, we commit ourselves to help bring people and communities to health and wholeness.

8
Bon Secours - St Mary's Hospital of Richmond Inc

The mission is to bring compassion to health care and to be good help to those in need, especially those who are poor and dying. as a system of caregivers, we commit ourselves to help bring people and communities to health and wholeness.

9
Rappahannock General Hospital Foundation Inc

The rappahannock general hospital foundation is a not for profit corporation established for the benefit and support of rappahannock general hospital. its purpose is to assist the hospital in accomplishing its mission through the…

10
Community Memorial Hospital

To provide excellence in the delivery of healthcare.

Health
11
Bon Secours-Richmond Community Hospital

The mission is to bring compassion to health care and to be good help to those in need, especially those who are poor and dying. As a system of caregivers, we commit ourselves to help bring people and communities to health and wholeness.

12
Belmont Professional Associates Inc

To improve the communitys health through the efficient provision, coordination, and integration of quality health services, health education, and research. To provide compassionate, quality health services according to the spiritual,…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sheltering Arms Corporation and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SHELTERING ARMS CORPORATION — $10,260,303 · HealthSHELTERING ARMS CORPORATIONSHELTERING ARMS FOUNDATION — $3,459,831 · HealthSHELTERING ARMS FOUNDATIONSHELTERING ARMS HOSPITAL SOUTH INC — $1,829,704 · HealthSHELTERING ARMS HOSPITAL SOUTH INC+1 more — $20,515 · HealthPALMYRA REHABILITATION CORPORATION — $185,829 · OtherBon Secours Richmond Healthcare Foundation — $150,000 · Other+1 more — $6,341 · OtherSeniorNavigatorcom — $5,595 · Community Improvement
Health$15,570,353Other$342,170Community Improvement$5,595

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSHELTERING ARMS CORPORATION — $10,260,303 over 2y, 41% of budgetSHELTERING ARMS FOUNDATION — $3,459,831 over 2y, 18% of budgetSHELTERING ARMS HOSPITAL SOUTH INC — $1,829,704 over 2y, 87% of budgetBon Secours Richmond Healthcare Foundation — $150,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $20,515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSeniorNavigatorcom — $5,595 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sheltering Arms Hospital funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph