Loading…
· Private foundation
SHAN & RAJAM THEVENTHIRAN CHARITABLE
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$4k
Granted FY2024
8
Grants
4
Communities
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 78% of SHAN & RAJAM THEVENTHIRAN CHARITABLE’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02FY2024 · 8 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$140
Median grant
4
States reached
$954k
Total assets
Largest grants
- INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION$2,300
- SJC87 INITIATIVE INC$650
- UNICEF$237
- CITY HARVEST$140
- NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY$110
- THE CARTER CENTER$103
- ST PATRICK'S CHURCH$100
- ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$100
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 11%. 90% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$92k · 14 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else
14 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
14
6
Total granted
$92k
$1k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+25%
+199%
Still filing today
43%
33%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
EducationInternationalYouth DevelopmentPublic Safety & DisasterHealthFood & NutritionOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SISJC87 INITIATIVE INC7× · 2018–2024 · $7k · revenue +117%
- CFCARE FOR EDUCATION2× · 2021–2022 · $6k · revenue +34%
- NHNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION2× · 2022–2023 · $1k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- TKTECH KIDS UNLIMITEDgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $500 · revenue +199%
- ACAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYone grant, 2018 · $200
- TCTEEN CHALLENGE INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $100 · revenue +37%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
The Poptech Institute
Poptech's mission is to accelerate the positive impact of world-changing people, projects and ideas.
Education
2
New York Institute of Technology
We are committed to educating the next generation of leaders and inspiring innovation. (see sch o)
Education
3
Literacy Design Collaborative Inc
Seeks to ensure that every student in america graduates from (continued on schedule o) high school with the literacy skills necessary for success in college and career. ldc is a teacher-created instructional design system that transforms…
Education
4
Fordham University
To provide the highest quality education to undergraduate and graduate students, in the jesuit tradition.
Education
5
Neurodiversity Education Research
The mission of the neurodiversity education research center is to equip and prepare students for an emerging 21st century global scientific workforce. we will accomplish our mission through research- based teaching and learning strategies,…
Education
6
New York University
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes.
Education
7
Uncommon New York City Charter Schools
Uncommon new york city charter schools prepares our students to enter, succeed in, and graduate from college. our organization comprises 23 high-performing public schools located in brooklyn neighborhoods, including brownsville, crown…
Education
8
National Council of University Research
To serve all members by advancing expertise in the profession of research administration.
—
9
Technology Policy Institute
International
10
The Learnability Network
Education
11
Challenging Minds
Youth Development
12
Ek Kadam Aur
1. internship to students in the united states. 2. provide education to blind children in india who do not go to school due to poverty. 3. active learning for high school in india. 4. high school leadership program in india and nepal. 5.…
International
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Network for Good and the most unlike its peers is SJC87 Initiative Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$72,153Education$13,238Public Safety & Disaster$5,145Health$1,200International$503Youth Development$500Food & Nutrition$140
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation SHAN & RAJAM THEVENTHIRAN CHARITABLE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CARE FOR EDUCATION.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 474015793 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on CARE FOR EDUCATION, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 7% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Shan & Rajam Theventhiran Charitable?
Find your warmest path to Shan & Rajam Theventhiran Charitable through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines