Skip to content

· Private foundation

SHAH FAMILY FOUNDATION inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$667
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Religion$2kHealth$2kInternational$601Public Safety & Disaster$500Food & Nutrition$450Education$400Arts & Culture$300Youth Development$252Other$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
6
States reached
$63k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RADHA KRISHNA TEMPLE OF DALLAS$667
LIFE GLOBAL INC$501
Individual grant recipient$500
NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK$300
UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT$200
MAYO CLINIC$100
Individual grant recipient$100
U T SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER$100
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$100
TARRANT AREA FOOD BANK$100
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH$100
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$100
DFW HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY$72
SALVATION ARMY PLANO$50
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SEWA INTERNATIONAL INC: $100 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
PA
NJ
DE
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of SHAH FAMILY FOUNDATION inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 55% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 62%.

SHAH FAMILY FOUNDATION inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3k · 8 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
15

Total granted

$3k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
+8%

Still filing today

38%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
ReligionAnimalsInternationalHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RK
    RADHA KRISHNA TEMPLE OF DALLAS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $718
  • DH
    DFW HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $661
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT
    3× · 2023–2025 · $300

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $500
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $302
  • BS
    BHARTIYA SENIOR CITIZENS OF DALLAS
    one grant, 2023 · $300
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
2
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
3
Lifegift Organ Donation Center

The mission of lifegift is to provide community benefit by ethically, effectively and efficiently recovering appropriately transplantable organs and tissue to give the gift of life. lifegift also provides public and professional education…

Health
4
HealthTexas Provider Network

To deliver the highest value patient experience through quality, safety, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, enhanced by medical education and research in collaboration with Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
5
OhioHealth Corporation Group Return

To improve the health of those we serve.

Health
6
Immunizeorg

Immunize.org supports effective immunization practice through our educational and clinical resources and our collaboration with partners to shape and advocate for policies that remove barriers to immunization for people of all ages.

Health
7
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
8
Medstar Health Research Institute Inc

See schedule omedstar health research institute is dedicated to supporting the academic platform of medstar health by conducting high quality translational and health sciences research throughout the medstar system.

—
9
Feeding America

Our mission is to advance change in America by ensuring equitable access to nutritious food for all in partnership with partner food banks, policymakers, supporters, and the communities we serve.

Food & Nutrition
10
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
11
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
12
Biotechnology Innovation Organization

The biotechnology innovation organization (bio) represents approximately 1,000 companies and organizations in washington dc, state capitals, and international fora. bio is founded on the principle that policy must nurture innovation in the…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Texas Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Vyo Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
3/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RADHA KRISHNA TEMPLE OF DALLAS: $718 · OtherRADHA KRISHNA TEMPLE OF DALLASDFW HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $661 · OtherDFW HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient: $500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $302 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $300 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKUNIVERSITY OF DETROIT: $300 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF DETROITBHARTIYA SENIOR CITIZENS OF DALLAS: $300 · OtherBHARTIYA SENIOR CITIZENS OF DALLASST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH: $200 · OtherU T SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER: $200 · Other+15 more: $1,070 · Other+15 moreLIFE GLOBAL INC: $501 · InternationalVYO USA INC: $252 · ReligionBHARATIYA SENIOR CITIZENS OF DALLAS: $200 · ReligionMAYO CLINIC: $200 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $50 · HealthSewa International Inc: $100 · Human ServicesHumane Society of North Texas: $75 · Animals
Other$5,051International$501Religion$452Health$250Human Services$100Animals$75

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIFE GLOBAL INC: $501 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVYO USA INC: $252 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSewa International Inc: $100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society of North Texas: $75 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIFE GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds VYO USA INC ↗
  • Who funds BHARATIYA SENIOR CITIZENS OF DALLAS ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds Sewa International Inc ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society of North Texas ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization SHAH FAMILY FOUNDATION inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from SHAH FAMILY FOUNDATION inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to SHAH FAMILY FOUNDATION inc?

    Find your warmest path to SHAH FAMILY FOUNDATION inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on SHAH FAMILY’s filings →

    More from the funding graph