Skip to content

· Public charity

Service Employees International Union

Seiu6 property services nw, conducts various activities associated with the representation of its membership through collective bargaining, civic, social, political, charitable and other activities that will advance their efforts on behalf of its members in the state of washington.

$75k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.

Employment$84kHousing & Shelter$50kCivil Rights$31kReligion$16kPublic Benefit$15kCrime & Legal$5k
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $24,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $74,981 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $50,981 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PUGET SOUND SAGE$10,000
TRANSIT RIDERS UNION$8,000
WORKING WASHINGTON$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MARTIN LUTHER KING JR LABOR COUNCIL: $10k → 9%SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION WA STATE COUNCIL PAC: $6k → 9%UNEMPLOYMENT LAW PROJECT: $5k → 9%TRANSIT RIDERS UNION: $8k → 9%TRANSIT RIDERS UNION: $8k → 9%TRANSIT RIDERS UNION: $8k → 9%TRANSIT RIDERS UNION: $8k → 9%ONE AMERICA: $5k → 9%TRANSIT RIDERS UNION: $8k → 9%ONE AMERICA: $5k → 9%TRANSIT RIDERS UNION: $8k → 9%ONE AMERICA: $5k → 9%PUGET SOUND SAGE: $10k → 9%PUGET SOUND SAGE: $8k → 9%PUGET SOUND SAGE: $8k → 9%WORKING WASHINGTON: $6k → 9%PUGET SOUND SAGE: $8k → 9%WORKING WASHINGTON: $6k → 9%PUGET SOUND SAGE: $8k → 9%WORKING WASHINGTON: $6k → 9%PUGET SOUND SAGE: $8k → 9%WORKING WASHINGTON: $6k → 9%CHURCH COUNCIL OF GREATER SEATTLE: $6k → 9%NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT: $5k → 9%WORKING WASHINGTON: $6k → 9%CHURCH COUNCIL OF GREATER SEATTLE: $5k → 9%NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT: $5k → 9%WORKING WASHINGTON: $6k → 9%CHURCH COUNCIL OF GREATER SEATTLE: $5k → 9%NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$180k · 6 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

$180k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
+162%

Still filing today

83%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Social ScienceEmploymentPublic BenefitCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PS
    PUGET SOUND SAGE
    7× · 2018–2024 · $50k · revenue -18%
  • TR
    TRANSIT RIDERS UNION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $48k · revenue -3%
  • WW
    Working Washington
    7× · 2018–2024 · $36k · revenue -56%

Funded once

  • ML
    MARTIN LUTHER KING JR COUNTY LABOR COUNCILgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +162%
  • SE
    SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION WA STATE COUNCIL PAC
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
  • UL
    UNEMPLOYMENT LAW PROJECT
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seiu Healthcare 1199NW Multi-Employer Training & Education Fund
Health
2
Drivers Union

Drivers Union is a nonprofit organization that advances justice and fairness for gig economy workers, most of whom are immigrants and refugees, through organizing, education, advocacy, and free legal support.

Public Benefit
3
Service Employees Council

The seiu washington state council builds collective power by uniting the strength of our locals in washington state and our collective membership of over 150,000 members. we work collaboratively to coordinate political and legislative…

—
4
Tenants Union of Washington

The mission of the Tenants Union (TU) is to create housing justice through empowerment-based education, outreach, leadership development, organizing, and advocacy.

—
5
Fair Work Center

We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…

Employment
6
Nw Energy Coalition

The NW Energy Coalition is an alliance of over 100 environmental, civic, and human service organizations, utilities, and businesses in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia, plus many individual members. The NW Energy…

—
7
Afl-Cio Snohomish & Island County Labor Council

Member, affiliate, and community education for worker's issues - union and non-union

—
8
Service Employees Intl Union Local 49

Our mission as seiu local 49 is to improve the quality of life for our members, their families, and dependents by achieving a higher standard of living, by elevating their social conditions and by striving to create a more just society.…

—
9
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
10
Washington Ethnic Studies Now

Washington Ethnic Studies Now WAESN is a multigenerational majority POC-led nonprofit advancing Ethnic Studies and racial justice in Washington. We center people of color build youth-centered leadership and learning and organize…

Education
11
Skagit Legal Aid

To provide access to justice for low income and historically marginalized individuals through 1) providing free legal services to those persons who by reason of poverty and unable to effectively access the legal system, 2) promoting, and…

Crime & Legal
12
National Legal Advocacy Network Dba Glow

The National Legal Advocacy Network d/b/a Grassroots Law & Organizing for Workers is a legal non-profit organization dedicated to using legal strategies as a tool to build power for marginalized workers and create systemic change through…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Immigrant Rights Project; the most unlike its peers is Seiu Texas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Working Washington: $36,000 · OtherWorking WashingtonCHURCH COUNCIL OF GREATER SEATTLE: $15,500 · OtherCHURCH COUNCIL OF GREATER SEATTLENORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT: $15,320 · OtherNORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECTMARTIN LUTHER KING JR COUNTY LABOR COUNCIL: $10,000 · OtherMARTIN LUTHER KING JR COUNTY LABOR COUNCILSERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION WA STATE COUNCIL PAC: $6,000 · OtherSERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION WA STATE…PUGET SOUND SAGE: $50,000 · Social SciencePUGET SOUND SAGETRANSIT RIDERS UNION: $48,000 · EmploymentTRANSIT RIDERS UNIONONEAMERICA: $15,000 · Public BenefitUNEMPLOYMENT LAW PROJECT: $5,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$82,820Social Science$50,000Employment$48,000Public Benefit$15,000Crime & Legal$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPUGET SOUND SAGE: $50,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetTRANSIT RIDERS UNION: $48,000 over 7y, 4.1% of budgetWorking Washington: $36,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetNORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT: $15,320 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetONEAMERICA: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMARTIN LUTHER KING JR COUNTY LABOR COUNCIL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNEMPLOYMENT LAW PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PUGET SOUND SAGE ↗
  • Who funds TRANSIT RIDERS UNION ↗
  • Who funds Working Washington ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds ONEAMERICA ↗
  • Who funds MARTIN LUTHER KING JR COUNTY LABOR COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds UNEMPLOYMENT LAW PROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Social Justice Fund NorthwestWA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Social Justice Fund Northwest · Seattle Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Service Employees International Union funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Service Employees International Union. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Service Employees International Union?

    Find your warmest path to Service Employees International Union through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $104k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Service Employees International Union’s filings →

    More from the funding graph