Skip to content
Service Employees International Union 1199 New England Health Care Employee at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Service Employees International Union 1199 New England Health Care Employee

The objectives of the district are:(a) to organize and unite all workers within its jurisdiction without regard to race, color, gender, age, national origin, political belief, political affiliation, religious preference, personal associations or sexual preference.(b) to achieve for its members higher wages, shorter hours and improved…

$143k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Employment$76kCivil Rights$56kEducation$50kHealth$40kCrime & Legal$25kSocial Science$25kMembership Benefit$25kPublic Benefit$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $131,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $142,953 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $11,953 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $125k
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEIU$25,000
WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC$25,000
SEIU MINNESOTA - IOWA$25,000
SEIU HEALTHCARE 1199 NW$25,000
CANEL LODGE 700$25,000
SEIU EDUCATION SUPPORT FUN RUN$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 71% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%M4BL FUND CO ALLIANCE FOR GLOBAL JUSTICE: $25k → 15%SEIU EDUCATION SUPPORT FUN RUN: $6k → 12%SEIU MINNESOTA - IOWA: $25k → 14%CAMPAIGN FOR WORKING FAMILIES CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE: $25k → 22%WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC: $25k → 20%GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 14%CANEL LODGE 700: $25k → 7%A BETTER CONNECTICUT INSTITUTE: $25k → 11%SEIU HEALTHCARE 1199 NW: $15k → 9%SEIU LOCAL 73: $10k → 14%WORKING FAMILIES CAMPAGIN COMMITTEE: $8k → 22%STATE DEMOCRACY PROJECT: $21k → 20%GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $25k → 14%SEIU HEALTHCARE 1199 NW: $25k → 9%US LABOR AGAINST THE WAR: $6k → 14%SEIU: $25k → 14%SEIU (PUERTO RICO DISASTER RELIEF): $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
PA
CT
AZ
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$125k · 3 repeat orgs$231k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
9

Total granted

$125k
$150k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
-7%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $81k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Public BenefitEducationCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsEmploymentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +19%
  • SH
    SEIU HEALTHCARE 1199NW AND SUBSIDIARY
    2× · 2020–2025 · $40k · revenue +51%
  • SE
    SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION
    2× · 2018–2025 · $35k · revenue -2%

Funded once

  • AB
    A BETTER CONNECTICUT INSTITUTE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0% · 49% of their budget
  • Alliance for Global Justice Corp
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -91%
  • CF
    Campaign for Working Families Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seiu Healthcare 1199NW Multi-Employer Training & Education Fund
Health
2
Laborers International Union of 341 Hcl

Union hall devoted to the betterment of members compensation and working conditions, to secure recognition of workers rights to engage in collective bargaining, and to promote the development and maintenance of on-the-job safety practices…

—
3
Service Employees International Union 1199 New England Health Care Employee

The objectives of the district are:(a) to organize and unite all workers within its jurisdiction without regard to race, color, gender, age, national origin, political belief, political affiliation, religious preference, personal…

—
4
Service Employees International Union

To improve the quality of life through worker empowerment and a progressive labor movement.

—
5
Service Employees International Uni Michigan Strength in Action Council

To develop and lead the member local unions' strategy and program across local unions, industries and geographies to build power and win justice for workers, their families and their communities.

—
6
United Steel Paper and Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied

Work together to improve jobs, build a better future, promote fairness, justice and equality in the workplace and in society.

—
7
Laborers International Union of North America - Local 1076

The local is a nonprofit organization established to represent its members in wage and fringe benefits matters in the construction industry. the local's primary areas of jurisdiction are oakland and livingston counties.

—
8
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 825ABCDRRH

The work of the union, as the representative of its members, is to provide for the continuous employment of labor, to bring about stable conditions in the industry, and to establish necessary procedures for resolutions of disputes between…

—
9
Seiu Local 2015

Seiu local 2015 is a chartered local union of the service employees international union and is an unincorporated, tax-exempt association currently representing bargaining unit members.

—
10
Service Employees International Union Local No 73

Seiu local 73 is dedicated to improving the lives of workers and their families and creating a more just and humane society.

—
11
Working Washington

We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…

—
12
Laborers' International Union of North America

To improve working conditions and living standards of members through collective bargaining, education, training, and employee benefits.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Service Employees International Union; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
6/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SEIU HEALTHCARE 1199NW AND SUBSIDIARY: $40,000 · OtherSEIU HEALTHCARE 1199NW AND SUBSIDIARYSERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION: $35,000 · OtherSERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNIONINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPACE WORKERS LOCAL 700: $25,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPACE …SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION HEALTHCARE MINNESOTA AND IOWA: $25,000 · OtherSERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION HEALTHCARE MIN…SEIU LOCAL 73: $10,000 · OtherSEIU LOCAL 73WORKING FAMILIES CAMPAGIN COMMITTEE: $7,500 · OtherUS LABOR AGAINST RACISM AND WAR INC: $6,250 · OtherTALLER COMUNIDAD LA GOYCO INC: $10,000 · OtherTALLER COMUNIDAD LA GOYCO INCSEIU LEADERSHIP TRAINING AND EDUCATION FUND: $6,000 · OtherGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIV…A BETTER CONNECTICUT INSTITUTE INC: $25,000 · Public BenefitA BETTER CONNE…STATE DEMOCRACY PROJECT: $20,833 · Public BenefitSTATE DEMOCRAC…WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC: $25,000 · Civil RightsAlliance for Global Justice Corp: $25,000 · InternationalCampaign for Working Families Inc: $25,000 · Crime & LegalPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $20,000 · Health
Other$164,750Education$50,000Public Benefit$45,833Civil Rights$25,000International$25,000Crime & Legal$25,000Health$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEIU HEALTHCARE 1199NW AND SUBSIDIARY: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA BETTER CONNECTICUT INSTITUTE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 49% of budgetAlliance for Global Justice Corp: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCampaign for Working Families Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSTATE DEMOCRACY PROJECT: $20,833 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTALLER COMUNIDAD LA GOYCO INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUS LABOR AGAINST RACISM AND WAR INC: $6,250 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSEIU LEADERSHIP TRAINING AND EDUCATION FUND: $6,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Service Employees International Union 1199 New England Health Care Employee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Service Employees International Union 1199 New England Health Care Employee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Service Employees International Union 1199 New England Health Care Employee’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home