Skip to content
Senior Living Options Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Senior Living Options Inc

See schedule othe SENIOR LIVING OPTIONS INC.

$63k
Granted FY2021
7
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Food & Nutrition$419kHealth$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$10k
02FY2021 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k5 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$259M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MORISSANIA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$15,000
NYC AUXILIARY POLICE FOUNDATION$10,000
WILLIS AVENUE SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH$8,000
FOREVER MENTORSHIP PROGRAM$8,000
THE HOPE LINE$8,000
PAT'S OUTREACH MINISTRY$8,000
THE SKYLINE CHARIABLE FOUNDATION INC$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $268k) land where the poverty rate runs at 27%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UN: $3k → 6%MORISSANIA REVITALIZATION: $25k → 28%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $10k → 14%MORISSANIA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $15k → 28%BRONX WORKS: $200k → 28%RESOURCE CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $8k → 28%THE HOPE LINE: $8k → 28%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

30%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$135k · 6 repeat orgs$314k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$135k
$308k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+53%

Still filing today

50%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MR
    MORRISANIA REVITALIZATION CORP
    2× · 2020–2021 · $40k · revenue +11%
  • NY
    NEW YORK CITY POLICE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $30k · revenue -5%
  • GC
    GENERAL CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST
    2× · 2020–2021 · $21k

Funded once

  • BRONXWORKS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue +57%
  • PO
    PART OF THE SOLUTIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +53%
  • FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
City Harvest Inc

To end hunger in communities throughout new york city. (see schedule o)to end hunger in communities throughout new york city. we do this through food rescue and distribution, education, and other practical, innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
2
New York Blood Center Inc

As one of the most preeminent and comprehensive blood centers in theworld, nybc operates under a four-part mission. for more information,see sch. o and part iii, 4a-c.

Health
3
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
4
Food Bank Association of New York State

The mission of feeding new york state is to lead a unified effort for a hunger-free state of new york. the mission of food banking is to obtain food and deliver it to emergency food programs. feeding new york state works to end hunger by…

Food & Nutrition
5
Metropolitan New York Coordinating Council On Jewish Poverty

Metropolitan ny coordinating council is a not-for-profit organization which serves as a primary advocate for the social welfare needs of the poor, near-poor and elderly in the metro ny area. the entity is dedicated to the alleviation of…

Human Services
6
New York Common Pantry

New york common pantry reduces hunger while promoting dignity, health and self-sufficiency.

Food & Nutrition
7
Altruism for New York Foundationinc
Civil Rights
8
Foundation for Research of the New York Academy of Osteopathy Inc
—
9
Jewish Board of Family & Children's Services Inc

To empower new yorkers, providing integrated mental health and social services with compassion and expertise.

Human Services
10
The Real Estate Board of New York Inc

1. to unite in common organization those professionally engaged in real estate. 2. to protect and promote the mutual interests of its members. 3. to formulate and maintain ethical standards for the guidance of its members in their…

—
11
City Relief Inc

City relief provides fresh, nutritious meals and essential care items to individuals in need; as well as creating individualized action plans including connections to programs,offering support and encouragement.

Human Services
12
Jersey City Medical Center

The organization's mission is to offer healthcare services with compassion and dignity. the organization provides patients, their families and all in need, excellence in hospital and healthcare services and programs to enhance community…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food Bank for New York City; the most unlike its peers is The Jillian Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRONXWORKS INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesBRONXWORKS INCMORRISANIA REVITALIZATION CORP: $40,000 · Human ServicesMORRISANIA REVITALIZATION CORPThe Resource Center For Community Development Inc: $15,500 · Human ServicesThe Resource Center For Community Development IncAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesGENERAL CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST: $21,000 · OtherGENERAL CONFE…PATS OUTREACH MINISTRY INC: $15,500 · OtherPATS OUTREACH…FOREVER DC MENTORSHIP: $13,000 · OtherFOREVER DC ME…THE JILLIAN FUND: $5,000 · OtherTHE JILLIAN F…PART OF THE SOLUTION: $50,000 · Food & NutritionPART OF THE …NEW YORK CITY POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · Crime & LegalFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $25,000 · Community ImprovementRETT SYNDROME RESEARCH TRUST INC: $10,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 · HealthTHE SKYLINE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$268,000Other$54,500Food & Nutrition$50,000Crime & Legal$30,000Community Improvement$25,000Health$15,000Philanthropy$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRONXWORKS INC: $200,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPART OF THE SOLUTION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMORRISANIA REVITALIZATION CORP: $40,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNEW YORK CITY POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Resource Center For Community Development Inc: $15,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetRETT SYNDROME RESEARCH TRUST INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SKYLINE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JILLIAN FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Food Bank for New Yor…
Food Bank for New York CityNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Food Bank for New York City

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Senior Living Options Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Senior Living Options Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Senior Living Options Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Senior Living Options Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Senior Living Options’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home