Skip to content

· Private foundation

Selma Breskin Kaplan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$354k
Granted FY2024still arriving
62
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$180kReligion$116kInternational$83kHealth$83kHousing & Shelter$57kRecreation & Sports$52kYouth Development$30kEnvironment$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 62 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 62 grants below total $112,559, the rows itemized in this filing. The $353,648 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $241,089 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$1,069
Median grant
—
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHI-CARE$7,128
Michigan State University College of Osteopat$6,059
Friends of the State Street Family$5,702
Friends of the State Street Family$5,702
Friends of the State Street Family$5,346
McDermott Center dba Haymarket Center$5,346
North End Waterfront Health$5,346
Venice Family Clinic$4,455
Mt. Horeb Church$4,455
Community of Franciscan Friars of the Renew$4,455
Wellness Center Mental Health 345 S San Ped$4,396
Portugalia Sales Warehouse$3,029
SE Works, Inc$3,029
Chicago Recovery Alliance$3,029
Larkin Street Youth Services$2,673
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Cycle Kids Inc: $50k → 8%Make A Wish FOundation: $3k → 14%SEE ATTACHED: $217k → 14%Make A Wish FOundation: $3k → 14%SEE ATTACHED: $216k → 14%UCLA Foundation: $5k → 14%SEE ATTACHED: $360k → 14%SEE ATTACHED: $338k → 14%SEE ATTACHED: $211k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$207k · 29 repeat orgs$520k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
99

Total granted

$207k
$478k

Still filing today

0%
2%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    Friends of the State Street Family
    3× · 2021–2024 · $31k
  • BH
    Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program
    3× · 2021–2024 · $21k
  • PF
    Pope Francis Center
    2× · 2019–2021 · $13k

Funded once

  • IR
    Islamic Relief Fund
    one grant, 2019 · $82k
  • CK
    CYCLE KIDS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -42%
  • KT
    KISS THE GROUND
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue -40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 157 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
1/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Islamic Relief Fund: $82,462 · OtherIslamic Relief FundFriends of the State Street Family: $30,609 · OtherSalvation Army Poland: $28,500 · Other+151 more: $505,764 · Other+151 moreCYCLE KIDS INC: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsKISS THE GROUND: $30,000 · Food & NutritionUCLA FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Education
Other$647,335Recreation & Sports$50,000Food & Nutrition$30,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCYCLE KIDS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetKISS THE GROUND: $30,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CYCLE KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds KISS THE GROUND ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Selma Breskin Kaplan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Selma Breskin Kaplan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Selma Breskin Kaplan Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Selma Breskin Kaplan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 157 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $338k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Selma Breskin Kaplan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph