Skip to content

· Private foundation

Seherr-Thoss Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$213k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$109k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$578kEducation$252kArts & Culture$181kHuman Services$132kHealth$80kMembership Benefit$75kEmployment$43kEnvironment$32kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $159k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT #20$109,372
Individual grant recipient$50,000
LOURDES OF LITCHFIELD #2$15,499
CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF LITCHFIELD$10,000
MILTON CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH$10,000
ARETHUSA FARM FOUNDATION$10,000
MILTON PUBLIC HALL ASSOCIATION$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

None of its grants could be placed against low income need for this view.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$795k · 10 repeat orgs$894k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +119% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
20

Total granted

$795k
$691k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+119%
+14%

Still filing today

50%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 5% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $203k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEmploymentEnvironmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GREENWOODS COUNSELING & REFERRALS INC
    2× · 2017–2022 · $55k · revenue +422%
  • SB
    SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $47k · revenue +119%
  • PT
    PRIME TIME HOUSE INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $43k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • RS
    REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT #6
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • LC
    LITCHFIELD COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    one grant, 2020 · $83k · revenue -22%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $70k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Litchfield Historical Society

Museum

—
2
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
3
Wickham Park Tr
—
4
Litchfield Housing Trust Inc

Provide housing for individuals of modest means.

—
5
Greater Litchfield Preservation Trust Inc
—
6
Connecticut Land Conservation Council Inc

Connecticut Land Conservation Council, Inc.s mission is to elevate and strengthen land conservation in Connecticut.

Environment
7
Litchfield Health and Wellness Resources Inc

Litchfield health and wellness resources, inc.(lhwr) is committed to the residents of litchfield by providing support and assistance that will promote and encourage a healthy lifestyle. by working in partnership with local health care…

—
8
The Homestead Inc
—
9
Wright-Locke Land Trust Inc
Environment
10
Litchfield Hills Conservancy Inc

To identify, preserve and promote the natural, agricultural, scenic, recreational, historic, and cultural resources of Litchfield County, Connecticut and to work to conserve them for current and future generations by preserving and…

Environment
11
Candlewood Valley Regional Land Trust

The Candlewood Valley Regional Land Trust protects open spaces that contribute to the Candlewood Valley iconic rural New England character.

—
12
Lincoln Hill Retirement Community

The mission of the Center is to provide affordable, adult housing and vital community services to promote health and independence

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Litchfield Community Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friendly Hands Food Bank Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MICHAEL'S PARISH: $224,911 · OtherST MICHAEL'S PARISHWISDOM HOUSE: $120,187 · OtherWISDOM HOUSESHRINE OF LOURDES IN LITCHFIELD: $120,000 · OtherSHRINE OF LOURDES IN LITCHFIELDREGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT #20: $109,372 · OtherREGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT #20REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT #6: $100,000 · OtherREGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT #6Individual grant recipient: $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $67,495 · OtherWEST CEMETERY IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION: $58,500 · OtherMILTON CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $53,935 · OtherWARNER THEATRE: $50,000 · OtherTHE LITTLE GUILD OF SAINT FRANCIS: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · Other+15 more: $267,129 · Other+15 moreLITCHFIELD COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $83,000 · Human ServicesSUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC: $46,900 · Human ServicesGREENWOODS COUNSELING & REFERRALS INC: $55,132 · HealthThe Charlotte Hungerford Hospital: $25,000 · HealthKidsPlay Childrens Museum Inc: $50,000 · Arts & CulturePRIME TIME HOUSE INC: $42,600 · EmploymentLITCHFIELD LAND TRUST INC: $32,293 · EnvironmentArethusa Farm Foundation Inc: $10,000 · Food & NutritionFRIENDLY HANDS FOOD BANK INC: $2,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,341,529Human Services$129,900Health$80,132Arts & Culture$50,000Employment$42,600Environment$32,293Food & Nutrition$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLITCHFIELD COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $83,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetGREENWOODS COUNSELING & REFERRALS INC: $55,132 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetKidsPlay Childrens Museum Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetSUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC: $46,900 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetPRIME TIME HOUSE INC: $42,600 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetLITCHFIELD LAND TRUST INC: $32,293 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetLITCHFIELD HILLS ROWING CLUB: $31,735 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetGOSHEN PLAYERS INC: $31,200 over 3y, 17% of budgetThe Charlotte Hungerford Hospital: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITCHFIELD CEMETERY ASSN INVESTMENT: $16,250 over 1y, 14% of budgetCAMP MOHAWK INCORPORATED: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDLY HANDS FOOD BANK INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetLITCHFIELD HILLS CHORE SERVICE: $1,600 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LITCHFIELD COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENWOODS COUNSELING & REFERRALS INC ↗
  • Who funds KidsPlay Childrens Museum Inc ↗
  • Who funds SUSAN B ANTHONY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds PRIME TIME HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds LITCHFIELD LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds LITCHFIELD HILLS ROWING CLUB ↗
  • Who funds GOSHEN PLAYERS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Charlotte Hungerford Hospital ↗
  • Who funds LITCHFIELD CEMETERY ASSN INVESTMENT ↗
  • Who funds CAMP MOHAWK INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Arethusa Farm Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDLY HANDS FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds LITCHFIELD HILLS CHORE SERVICE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seherr-Thoss Charitable TrustNY28.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seherr-Thoss Charitable Trust · Northwest Community Bank Foundation Inc · The Connecticut Community Foundation · Northwest Connecticut Community Foundation Inc · McFadden Family Foundation · Crosswicks Foundation Ltd · Francis J and Louisa J Oneglia Foundation Inc · Torrington Savings Foundation · Union Savings Bank Foundation Inc · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Thomaston Savings Bank Foundation Inc · The Littman Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Seherr-Thoss Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Seherr-Thoss Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Prime Time House Inc: 50% of income from government
  • Greenwoods Counseling & Referrals Inc: 7% of income from government
  • The Charlotte Hungerford Hospital: 3% of income from government
  • Susan B Anthony Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Seherr-Thoss Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Seherr-Thoss Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Seherr-Thoss’ filings →

More from the funding graph