Skip to content

Tennessee · Public charity

Seeding Success

SEEDING SUCCESS is an organization that supports and promotes a "cradle to career" education agenda in shelby county. It serves as a facilitator advocate, and platform for collaboration around four goals: 1. Children enter kindegarten ready to learn. 2. Youth graduates high school "college ready". 3. Adults earn certifications and…

$1.5M
Granted FY2023
2
Itemized grants FY2023
2
Organizations funded FY2023
50%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2023
$1.4M
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2023
$750,000
Largest grant, FY2023
$750,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 2
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
1
Total assets, FY2023
$19M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 50% of the organizations Seeding Success funded were first-time grantees, receiving 48% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $700k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’22’23
EducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20232$1.4M50%
FY20221$1.0M100%
FY20181$41k0%
FY20171$42kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Environment$1.8MEducation$700kCommunity Improvement$42kEmployment$41k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Tennesseans for Quality Early Education$700,0001n/a
Leadership Memphis$82,83023%

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($1.8M), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Community Foundation of Greater Memphis IncTN13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Seeding Success with peer funders

About Seeding Success

How much does Seeding Success give?
Seeding Success reported 2 itemized grants totaling $1,450,000, out of $1,517,559 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 2 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Seeding Success fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2023, its largest causes are Environment (69%), Education (28%), Community Improvement (2%).
Who are Seeding Success's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2023: Tennesseans for Quality Early Education ($700k), Leadership Memphis ($83k).
Does Seeding Success fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Seeding Success?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc.
Where is Seeding Success based?
Seeding Success is based in TN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $3.0M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Seeding Success’ filings →

More from the funding graph