Skip to content

· Public charity

Second Century Habitat Fund Inc

To be advocates of habitat stewardship, collaborate with community partners, and be conservation leaders to benefit all of south dakota.

$783k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Environment$986kFood & Nutrition$174kAnimals$103k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $154,976, the rows itemized in this filing. The $783,344 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $628,368 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $98k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$34,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$379k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PHEASANTS FOREVER INC$50,002
DUDLEY & VERONICA REICHERT$45,000
WOLF CREEK RANCH LLC$34,500
MILLBORN SEEDS$18,521
SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF GAME FISH AND PARKS$6,953
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PHEASANTS FOREVER INC: $103k → 14%JBH DAKOTA LLC: $10k → 10%BRINK AG LLC: $9k → 8%AMBUR FARMS INC: $73k → 8%SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF GAME FISH AND PARKS: $7k → 10%WOLF CREEK RANCH LLC: $35k → 10%WERNER FAMILY FARM LLC: $135k → 12%MILLBORN SEEDS: $212k → 13%711 LLP: $12k → 14%RON BEIBER IRREVOCABLE TRUST: $18k → 16%MATHIS LAND AND CATTLE: $40k → 20%JP CATTLE PARTNERSHIP: $72k → 31%B&K RANCH: $15k → 35%DUDLEY & VERONICA: $45k → 42%PHEASANTS FOREVER INC: $50k → 14%WERNER FAMILY FARM LLC: $39k → 12%MILLBORN SEEDS: $124k → 13%JP PARTNERSHIP: $24k → 31%DUDLEY & VERONICA REICHERT: $45k → 42%MILLBORN SEEDS: $92k → 13%MILLBORN SEEDS: $58k → 13%MILLBORN SEEDS: $28k → 13%MILLBORN SEEDS: $19k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 5 repeat orgs$218k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
7

Total granted

$1.0M
$177k

Still filing today

20%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MILLBORN SEEDS
    6× · 2019–2024 · $532k
  • WF
    WERNER FAMILY FARM LLC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $174k
  • PF
    PHEASANTS FOREVER INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $153k · revenue +16% · 29% of their budget

Funded once

  • AF
    AMBUR FARMS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $73k
  • ML
    MATHIS LAND AND CATTLE
    one grant, 2021 · $40k
  • RB
    RON BEIBER IRREVOCABLE TRUST
    one grant, 2022 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2019–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2019 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
1/1
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MILLBORN SEEDS: $531,760 · OtherMILLBORN SEEDSWERNER FAMILY FARM LLC: $173,750 · OtherWERNER FAMILY FARM LLCPHEASANTS FOREVER INC: $152,502 · OtherPHEASANTS FOREVER INCJP CATTLE PARTNERSHIP: $96,000 · OtherJP CATTLE PARTNERSHIPDUDLEY & VERONICA: $90,000 · OtherDUDLEY & VERONICAAMBUR FARMS INC: $72,930 · OtherAMBUR FARMS INC+8 more: $145,433 · Other+8 more
Other$1,262,375

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPHEASANTS FOREVER INC: $152,502 over 2y, 29% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PHEASANTS FOREVER INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Second Century Habitat Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Second Century Habitat Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY21–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Second Century Habitat’s filings →

    More from the funding graph