Skip to content
Sea Mar Community Health Centers at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Sea Mar Community Health Centers

SEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS is a community-based organization committed to providing quality, comprehensive health, human, housing, educational, and cultural services to diverse communities, specializing in service to latinos.

$35M
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$3.4MArts & Culture$708kEducation$262kHousing & Shelter$120kRecreation & Sports$50kCommunity Improvement$40kHuman Services$30kCivil Rights$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $120,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $34,541,317 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $34,421,317 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$465M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEATTLE PARK FOUNDATION$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION$50,000
MARI'S PLACE FOR THE ARTS$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SEATTLE PARK FOUNDATION: $50k → 9%MARI'S PLACE FOR THE ARTS: $10k → 9%NORTHWEST COMMUNITIES EDUCATION CENTER: $145k → 17%NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $15k → 8%ENCANTO ARTS: $10k → 9%MARI'S PLACE FOR THE ARTS: $10k → 9%NORTHWEST COMMUNITIES' EDUCATION CENTER: $120k → 17%DISCOVER BURIEN: $30k → 9%MARI'S PLACE FOR THE ARTS: $10k → 9%NORTHWEST COMMUNITIES EDUCATION CENTER: $113k → 17%Solid Ground Washington: $30k → 9%NORTHWEST COMMUNITIES EDUCATION CENTER: $104k → 17%SOLID GROUND WASHINGTON: $30k → 9%NORTHWEST COMMUNITIES' EDUCATION CENTER: $88k → 17%SOLID GROUND WASHINGTON: $30k → 9%NORTHWEST COMMUNITIES' EDUCATION CENTER: $56k → 17%SOLID GROUND WASHINGTON: $30k → 9%NORTHWEST COMMUNITIES' EDUCATION CENTER: $43k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $82k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $55k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $50k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $50k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%SEA MAR SKILLED NURSING FACILITY: $2.5M → 9%SEA MAR SKILLED NURSING FACILITY: $285k → 9%SEA MAR SKILLED NURSING FACILITY: $276k → 9%SEA MAR SKILLED NURSING FACILITY: $212k → 9%Sea Mar Skilled Nursing Facility: $161k → 9%NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT: $10k → 9%PUMAS SEATTLE: $10k → 9%Partners for Rural Washington: $10k → 9%RIVERTON PARK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $30k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.5M · 5 repeat orgs$165k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

$4.5M
$105k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+32%

Still filing today

80%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementArts & CultureHousing & ShelterHealthEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NORTHWEST COMMUNITIES' EDUCATION CENTER
    7× · 2018–2024 · $668k · revenue +171%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $262k · revenue +11%
  • SG
    Solid Ground Washington
    4× · 2017–2020 · $120k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • DB
    DISCOVER BURIEN ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +11%
  • RP
    RIVERTON PARK UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF SEATTLE
    one grant, 2024 · $30k
  • NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Working Washington

We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…

—
2
Nw Energy Coalition

The NW Energy Coalition is an alliance of over 100 environmental, civic, and human service organizations, utilities, and businesses in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia, plus many individual members. The NW Energy…

—
3
Stewardship Partners

Stewardship Partners helps private landowners restore and preserve the natural landscapes of WA State. We collaborate with diverse interest groups to build bridges and find solutions that achieve mutual goals of environmental protection,…

Environment
4
Emergency Management Group - Washington
Public Safety & Disaster
5
We Heart Seattle

We Heart Seattle is an action-based, boots-on-the-ground movement that organizes trash cleanups in our public spaces and offers resources to those in need. Through our direct civic engagement we lead the way to a more compassionate and…

Community Improvement
6
Invest in Washington Now Campaign

Advocate for tax policy in Washington State

—
7
Spark Northwest

Founded in 2001, Spark Northwest accelerates the just transition to clean energy in the Pacific Northwest. Spark Northwest uses two primary strategies: (1) on-the-ground project consulting, focusing on communities with limited financial…

Environment
8
Washington Bikes

Washington Bikes works to ensure that all who ride a bicycle in Washington have safe comfortable and convenient places to ride. Organization advocates for bicyclists rights and shapes policies.

Recreation & Sports
9
Rural Peoples Platform

The Rural Peoples Platform organizes people across rural North Central Washington around local initiatives and a long-term agenda that makes economic stability possible and sustainable for all working people and families.

Community Improvement
10
Pacific Northwest Music Project
Arts & Culture
11
Home Court Nw
Recreation & Sports
12
Washington Filmworks

To build and enhance the competitiveness of Washington State's film and associated creative industry. We accomplish this by marketing and managing the state's production incentive program, representing the state in national and…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Parks Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Encanto Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SEA MAR SKILLED NURSING FACILITY: $3,412,969 · OtherSEA MAR SKILLED NURSING FACILITY+3 more: $50,000 · OtherNORTHWEST COMMUNITIES' EDUCATION CENTER: $668,120 · Arts & CultureNORTHWEST COMMUN…+1 more: $10,000 · Arts & CultureUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $262,000 · EducationSolid Ground Washington: $120,000 · Housing & ShelterSEATTLE PARKS FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsDISCOVER BURIEN ASSOCIATION: $30,000 · Community ImprovementWashington State Rural Development Council: $10,000 · Community ImprovementEVERY ORG: $30,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $15,000 · Health
Other$3,462,969Arts & Culture$678,120Education$262,000Housing & Shelter$120,000Recreation & Sports$50,000Community Improvement$40,000Philanthropy$30,000Health$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEA MAR SKILLED NURSING FACILITY: $3,412,969 over 5y, 99% of budgetNORTHWEST COMMUNITIES' EDUCATION CENTER: $668,120 over 7y, 23% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $262,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSolid Ground Washington: $120,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSEATTLE PARKS FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDISCOVER BURIEN ASSOCIATION: $30,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetEVERY ORG: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetENCANTO ARTS: $10,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationAmerican Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …
Seattle FoundationWA13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sea Mar Community Health Centers funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sea Mar Community Health Centers. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • National Association of Community Health Centers Inc: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sea Mar Community Health Centers’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home