Skip to content

· Public charity

Scholarship Fund of the University Club of Palo Alto

To make college scholarships available for deserving local high school students that are not affiliated with the organization.

$192k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$479k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $143,839, the rows itemized in this filing. The $192,084 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $48,245 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $105k
$12,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF SO CAL$27,122
UC DAVIS$24,186
UC BERKELEY$15,000
SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY$13,755
UC SANTA BARBARA$12,686
UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANISCO$12,000
UC SAN DIEGO$8,200
SAN JOSE STATE$6,890
CAL STATE SACRAMENTO$6,000
HAMPTON UNIVERSITY$6,000
UC IRVINE$6,000
RENSSELAER POLTECHNIC INS$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY: $14k → 8%UC IRVINE: $8k → 10%UC BERKELEY: $33k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANISCO: $12k → 10%SAN DIEGO STATE: $5k → 11%UC RIVERSIDE: $10k → 11%UC DAVIS: $13k → 12%CAL STATE SACRAMENTO: $6k → 12%UC SANTA CRUZ: $20k → 13%CAL STATE NORTHRIDGE: $5k → 14%UC SANTA BARBARA: $13k → 14%UC DAVIS: $24k → 16%RENSSELAER POLTECHNIC INS: $6k → 11%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY: $8k → 8%HAMPTON UNIVERSITY: $6k → 14%STANFORD: $5k → 8%UC IRVINE: $6k → 10%UNIVERSITY CALIFORNIA OF BERKELEY: $26k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10k → 10%UC SAN DIEGO: $8k → 11%CAL POLY - SLO: $9k → 12%CAL STATE SACRAMENTO: $6k → 12%UC SANTA CRUZ: $12k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF SO CAL: $27k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SANTA BARBARA: $5k → 14%UC DAVIS: $23k → 16%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY: $6k → 8%HAMPTON UNIVERSITY: $6k → 14%UC BERKELEY: $25k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $12k → 14%UNIVERSITY CALIFORNIA OF BERKELEY: $18k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANISCO: $10k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SO CAL: $10k → 14%UC BERKELEY: $15k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANISCO: $6k → 10%UCLA: $7k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $8k → 14%UCLA: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$378k · 12 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$378k
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
+260%

Still filing today

17%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $117k
  • University of San Francisco
    5× · 2021–2025 · $48k · revenue -3%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $48k

Funded once

  • CP
    CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $22k
  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT RIVERSIDE
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • AE
    Ascendium Education Group Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +260%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
2
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
3
University of the Pacific

To provide a superior, student-centered learning experience integrating liberal arts and professional education and preparing individuals for lasting achievement and responsible leadership in their careers and communities.

Education
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
6
University of Chicago

The mission of the university of chicago has been to sustain at the highest level of excellence, the communication of knowledge, the creation of knowledge and the fostering of a dynamic community of scholars and students.

Education
7
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
8
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
9
University of California San Francisco Foundation

Organization's mission ====================== the university of california, san francisco(ucsf) is among the world's leading universities dedicated to advancing health worldwide through biomedical research, graduate-level education in the…

Education
10
Claremont Graduate University

Claremont Graduate University prepares individuals to be leaders for positive change in the world. Unique in its transdisciplinary approach, the University is dedicated to the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge and…

Education
11
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
12
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of San Francisco; the most unlike its peers is University of Southern California. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY: $117,387 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEYUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS: $47,628 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVISUNIVERSITY OF SO CAL: $37,122 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SO CALREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $31,790 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIACALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY: $22,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA: $17,686 · OtherSAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY: $14,890 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT IRVINE: $14,000 · Other+6 more: $58,857 · Other+6 moreUniversity of San Francisco: $48,000 · EducationUniversity of San FranciscoUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $20,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALI…RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $14,000 · EducationRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATI…SAN FRANCISCO CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $13,755 · EducationSAN FRANCISCO CONSERVATORY …Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $6,000 · EducationAscendium Education Group Inc: $5,710 · EducationCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION: $5,261 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · Education
Other$361,360Education$117,726

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of San Francisco: $48,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $13,755 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAscendium Education Group Inc: $5,710 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION: $5,261 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of San Francisco ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute ↗
  • Who funds Ascendium Education Group Inc ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA11.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Scholarship Fund of the University Club of Palo Alto funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Scholarship Fund of the University Club of Palo Alto. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Rutgers University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Scholarship Fund of the University Club of Palo Alto?

Find your warmest path to Scholarship Fund of the University Club of Palo Alto through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Scholarship Fund of the University Club of Palo Alto’s filings →

More from the funding graph