Skip to content

· Private foundation

Schiel B-R-C-P-B-B-L Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$575k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$1.9MEducation$390kYouth Development$210kFood & Nutrition$95kCrime & Legal$50kAnimals$34kPublic Safety & Disaster$3k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $480k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UT - MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$100,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$100,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$100,000
TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$80,000
BOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY$50,000
THE BROOKWOOD COMMUNITY$50,000
HOUSTON FOOD BANK$25,000
ST THOMAS HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION$20,000
TRINITY LUTHERAN SCHOOL$20,000
BRIDGES TO LIFE$10,000
HOUSTON SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CRUELTY OF ANIMALS$10,000
GREATER HOUSTON LUMBER & BLDG MAT DLRS ASSOC CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$5,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MENARD$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 79% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $100k → 14%THE BROOKWOOD COMMUNITY: $50k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $100k → 16%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $100k → 17%SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $100k → 14%THE BROOKWOOD COMMUNITY: $40k → 14%ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $100k → 16%SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $100k → 14%THE BROOKWOOD COMMUNITY: $40k → 14%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $125k → 16%SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $100k → 14%THE BROOKWOOD COMMUNITY: $35k → 14%UT - MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $100k → 16%SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $100k → 14%THE BROOKWOOD COMMUNITY: $35k → 14%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $100k → 16%THE BROOKWOOD COMMUNITY: $35k → 14%MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $100k → 16%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $100k → 16%MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $100k → 16%SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $100k → 16%HOUSTON SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CRUELTY OF ANIMALS: $10k → 16%HOUSTON SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CRUELTY OF ANIMALS: $10k → 16%HOUSTON SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CRUELTY OF ANIMALS: $10k → 16%BOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY: $50k → 16%BOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY: $40k → 16%BOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY: $40k → 16%BOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY: $35k → 16%BOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY: $35k → 16%BOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY: $35k → 16%ST THOMAS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $25k → 16%HOUSTON FOOD BANK: $25k → 16%HOUSTON FOOD BANK: $20k → 16%HOUSTON FOOD BANK: $20k → 16%HOUSTON FOOD BANK: $20k → 16%HOUSTON FOOD BANK: $20k → 16%HOUSTON FOOD BANK: $15k → 16%ST THOMAS HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $20k → 16%ST THOMAS HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $20k → 16%ST THOMAS HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%ST THOMAS HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%ST THOMAS HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%TRINITY LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $25k → 16%TRINITY LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $25k → 16%TRINITY LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $20k → 16%TRINITY LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $20k → 16%TRINITY LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $20k → 16%TRINITY LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 16 repeat orgs$226k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
2

Total granted

$3.0M
$26k

Still filing today

25%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationReligionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    Texas Children's Hospital
    6× · 2020–2025 · $410k · revenue +69%
  • The Brookwood Community Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $235k · revenue +96%
  • The Houston Food Bank
    6× · 2020–2025 · $120k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • ST
    ST THOMAS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • MV
    MILLERSVIEW VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
    one grant, 2020 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $600,000 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDRENTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $325,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTERALSACST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $300,000 · OtherALSACST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITALBOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY: $235,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRYST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $200,000 · OtherST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITALMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $200,000 · OtherMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTERTRINITY LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $130,000 · OtherTRINITY LUTHERAN SCHOOLThe Houston Food Bank: $120,000 · OtherUT - MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $100,000 · Other+6 more: $116,500 · OtherTexas Children's Hospital: $410,000 · HealthTexas Children's …ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'…The Brookwood Community Inc: $235,000 · EducationST THOMAS HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $80,000 · ReligionBRIDGES TO LIFE: $60,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$2,326,500Health$510,000Education$235,000Religion$80,000Crime & Legal$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTexas Children's Hospital: $410,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Brookwood Community Inc: $235,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $120,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST THOMAS HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetBRIDGES TO LIFE: $60,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MENARD: $30,000 over 6y, 3.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds The Brookwood Community Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ST THOMAS HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES TO LIFE ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MENARD ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schiel B-R-C-P-B-B-L Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schiel B-R-C-P-B-B-L Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Schiel B-R-C-P-B-B-L’s filings →

    More from the funding graph