Skip to content

· Private foundation

SBT Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$103k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$103k
Largest
01What it funds
0178% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2022.

Religion$24kHealth$250Public Safety & Disaster$178Food & Nutrition$118Arts & Culture$54Education$18Crime & Legal$18Human Services$18Other$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$102,505
Median grant
1
States reached
$339k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$102,505
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $68) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Chaim Medical Resource: $50 → 14%Misaskim Corp: $18 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

14%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$35k · 4 repeat orgs$219k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
47

Total granted

$35k
$117k

Still filing today

0%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $103k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22
Public Safety & DisasterHealthHuman ServicesReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2019–2020 · $23k
  • CY
    Cong Yetev Lev D'Satmar
    2× · 2019–2020 · $7k
  • CO
    CHAVEIRIM OF KJ
    2× · 2019–2020 · $3k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $97k
  • BR
    BAIS RUCHEL DSATMAR INC
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mishken Chaim Rivnits

Assistance to the indigent

Religion
2
Bikur Cholim of Manhattan Inc

To assist the sick and elderly by providing financial support for medical expenses, hot meals for the invalid home-bound, patient advocacy and support, new mother convalescence, patient family support, overnight accomodations for visiting…

Health
3
Keren Hatzadik in Memory of Rabbi Aryeh Levin of Blessed Memory Inc

The entity's mission is to engage in humanitarian assistanceby distributing food and other essential needs to needy families.

International
4
Tzevet Hatzolah Emergency Response

Ensure that every segment of israeli society is protected from terrorism and is well equipped to respond to life threatening emergencies

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Chaverim Israel Family Services Inc

To provide medical support to families in need

Employment
6
Williamsburg Volunteers of Hatzolah

To aid and assist as first responders in pre-hospital emergencies.

Health
7
Hatzoloh Incorporated Dba Chevra Hatzalah

Chevra Hatzalah, a non-profit corporation, is the largest all-volunteer Ambulance Service in the United States, providing premium quality pre-hospital emergency medical treatment and transportation at no cost to all who need it, regardless…

Health
8
Bikur Cholim of Ny Inc

Medical Guidance

—
9
Hatzalah of Newark Ems Inc
Health
10
Chaverim of Bergen County a Nj Nonprofit Corporation

Chaveirim of bergen county provides roadside assistance and other non- medical emergency help free of charge at home or on the road.

Public Benefit
11
Keren Avraham Shmuel Inc Wachman
Philanthropy
12
Shaarei Refuah Inc

Shaarei refuah (gates of mercy) was founded in order to: provide medical equipment, ambulances and strechers to assist the sick and wounded. to provide relief and assistance to victims of terror and the critically ill. to provide ambulance…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chaim Medical Resource Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $102,505 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $97,474 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $23,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+41 more: $31,209 · Other+41 moreSHMIRA CIVILIAN VOLUNTEER PATROL OF BORO PARK: $110 · Public Safety & DisasterHATZOLAH OF WILLIAMSBURG INC: $50 · Public Safety & DisasterREFUAH HELPLINE INCDBA REFUAH RESOURCES: $100 · HealthKAPAYIM INC: $50 · HealthCHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCE INC: $50 · Human ServicesMISASKIM CORP: $18 · Human ServicesENKAS USIR INC: $18 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BNAI LEVY FOUNDATION: $5 · Philanthropy
Other$254,188Public Safety & Disaster$160Health$150Human Services$68Religion$18Philanthropy$5

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHMIRA CIVILIAN VOLUNTEER PATROL OF BORO PARK: $110 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFUAH HELPLINE INCDBA REFUAH RESOURCES: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHATZOLAH OF WILLIAMSBURG INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKAPAYIM INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BNAI LEVY FOUNDATION: $5 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHMIRA CIVILIAN VOLUNTEER PATROL OF BORO PARK ↗
  • Who funds REFUAH HELPLINE INCDBA REFUAH RESOURCES ↗
  • Who funds HATZOLAH OF WILLIAMSBURG INC ↗
  • Who funds KAPAYIM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY37.6× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Yr Foundation · Zelig and Rifky Weiss Family Foundation Inc · Vyazreim Inc · United Fulop Foundation · Kanfei Yoneh Foundation · Blum Foundation · Greenzweig Family Foundation · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · Zichron Ayol Foundation · Lighting Foundation · J&G Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization SBT Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from SBT Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on SBT’s filings →

    More from the funding graph