Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Montana · Private foundation

Save our Gallatin Front Inc

Develop reasonable alternatives for the harvesting of timber from the Gallatin Front Range and then work to educate the public and the Department of Natural Resources and Conservation (DNRC) on the benefit of these so that we can implement practices that better manage this critical viewshed. Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds…

$99k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
1
Grants FY2025
1
Organizations funded FY2019
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$99,061
Largest grant, FY2025
$99,061
States reached, FY2025
1
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Animals$99kEnvironment$20k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Sacajawea Audubon Society$99,0611n/a
Earthjustice$20,00010%

Compare Save our Gallatin Front Inc with peer funders

About Save our Gallatin Front Inc

How much does Save our Gallatin Front Inc give?
Save our Gallatin Front Inc reported 1 grants totaling $99,061 in its FY2025 IRS filing.
What does Save our Gallatin Front Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2025, its largest causes are Animals (83%), Environment (17%).
Who are Save our Gallatin Front Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2025: Sacajawea Audubon Society ($99k), Earthjustice ($20k).
Does Save our Gallatin Front Inc accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Where is Save our Gallatin Front Inc based?
Save our Gallatin Front Inc is based in MT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home