Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sara & Damon Gadd Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$225k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0186% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20202025.

Environment$416kHealth$330kInternational$175kRecreation & Sports$75kFood & Nutrition$50kHuman Services$40kArts & Culture$25kHousing & Shelter$25kCivil Rights$21kOther$216k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY$100,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC$50,000
FRIENDS OF THE WARNER PARKS$25,000
PBS FOUNDATION$25,000
NPR FOUNDATION$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CORE: $30k → 14%YWCA USA INC: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NY
MA
OR
PA
CA
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
HI

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 7 repeat orgs$301k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
10

Total granted

$1.1M
$251k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-5%
+40%

Still filing today

86%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentHuman ServicesHealthCivil RightsEducationInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WR
    WESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $366k · revenue -5%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $330k · revenue +40%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $175k · revenue -40%

Funded once

  • MAUI FOOD BANK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +138%
  • P
    PBS
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • C
    CORE
    one grant, 2021 · $30k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
3
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
4
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
5
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
6
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
7
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
8
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
9
Women Donors Network

Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.

Philanthropy
10
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
11
Women's World Banking Inc

The mission of women's world banking is to expand the economicassets, participation and power of low-income women and theirhouseholds by helping them access financial services, knowledge andmarkets. for more information, see schedule o.

International
12
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ywca Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Core. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY — $366,000 · EnvironmentWESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCYENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $50,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPO…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $330,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATI…NPR — $55,000 · OtherNPRPBS — $50,000 · OtherPBSGREEN MOUNTAIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $25,000 · OtherGREEN MOUNTAIN HABITAT …NPR FOUNDATION — $25,000 · OtherNPR FOUNDATIONBIG SISTER ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON INC — $20,000 · OtherBIG SISTER ASSOCIATION …WOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherPBS FOUNDATION — $25,000 · OtherPBS FOUNDATIONHabitat for Humanity of NC Inc — $25,000 · OtherHabitat for Humanity of…AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $20,500 · OtherAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIE…THE MALALA FUND — $20,500 · OtherTHE MALALA FUNDWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $175,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL …FRIENDS OF THE WARNER PARKS INC — $75,000 · Recreation & SportsMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $50,000 · Food & NutritionCORE — $30,000 · Human ServicesYWCA USA INC — $10,000 · Human Services
Environment$416,000Health$330,000Other$286,000International$175,000Recreation & Sports$75,000Food & Nutrition$50,000Human Services$40,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWESTERN RIVERS CONSERVANCY — $366,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $330,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $175,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WARNER PARKS INC — $75,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPBS FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREEN MOUNTAIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of NC Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $20,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MALALA FUND — $20,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBIG SISTER ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA USA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC10.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sara & Damon Gadd Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 8%
  • Women's Lunch Place Inc8% of income from government
  • Western Rivers Conservancy0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph