Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sandra E Lamb Charitable Trust

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$240k
Granted FY2026still arriving
8
Grants FY2026still arriving
7
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202026.

Animals$729kHealth$596kCommunity Improvement$133k
02FY2026 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$30,062
Median grant
7
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$30,062
BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY$30,062
NATIONAL HUMANE EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY$30,062
AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION$30,062
ASPCA$30,062
HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS$30,062
PATH PARTNERNSHIPS$30,062
CAPITAL HOSPICE$30,062
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–26, $182k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CAPITAL HOSPICE: $30k → 6%CAPITAL HOSPICE: $28k → 6%CAPITAL HOSPICE: $25k → 6%Capital Hospice: $25k → 6%CAPITAL HOSPICE: $25k → 6%CAPITAL HOSPICE: $25k → 6%CAPITAL HOSPICE: $24k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
NY
UT
WV
VA
MD
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 9 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2026, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$1.4M
$30k

Still filing today

89%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthAnimalsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    7× · 2020–2026 · $182k · revenue +13%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    7× · 2020–2026 · $182k · revenue +37%
  • HW
    Humane World for Animals Inc
    7× · 2020–2026 · $182k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • NH
    NATIONAL HUMANE EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2026 · $30k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
2
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
3
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
4
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
5
New Hampshire Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To save the lives of animals through rescue, rehabilitation and adoption; to promote learning, eliminate animal cruelty and be a leader in advancing the highest standards in animal welfare.

Animals
6
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
7
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
8
600 Million Stray Dogs Need You Corporation

To end the #1 cause of suffering and death for dogs and cats globally, by developing food that will spay and neuter them, without surgery and end the overpopulation problem without killing.

Animals
9
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc

To create and lead alliances and public-private partnerships that advance breakthrough biomedical discoveries and improve the quality of people's lives

Health
10
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals
11
Lucky Dog Animal Rescue

Lucky dog animal rescue is a volunteer-powered nonprofit dedicated to rescuing homeless, neglected, and abandoned animals from certain euthanasia and finding them loving forever homes. we educate the community and all pet owners on…

Animals
12
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc

Protection of animal rights

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Path Partnerships and the most unlike its peers is Fauquier Health Foundation Dba the Path Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $182,232 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF…Humane World for Animals Inc — $182,232 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals IncBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $182,232 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETYALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $182,232 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DI…AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION — $182,232 · HealthAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATIONFAUQUIER HEALTH FOUNDATION DBA THE PATH FOUNDATION — $49,507 · HealthFAUQUIER HEALTH FOUNDATION DBA T…NAT'L HUMANE EDUCATIONAL SOC — $152,170 · OtherNAT'L HUMANE EDUCATIONAL…PATH PARTNERSHIPS — $132,725 · OtherPATH PARTNERSHIPSNATIONAL HUMANE EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY — $30,062 · OtherNATIONAL HUMANE EDUCATIO…Capital Hospice — $182,232 · Human ServicesCapital Hospic…
Animals$546,696Health$413,971Other$314,957Human Services$182,232

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $182,232 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCapital Hospice — $182,232 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $182,232 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $182,232 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $182,232 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION — $182,232 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPATH PARTNERSHIPS — $132,725 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetFAUQUIER HEALTH FOUNDATION DBA THE PATH FOUNDATION — $49,507 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds Capital Hospice
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds PATH PARTNERSHIPS
  • Who funds FAUQUIER HEALTH FOUNDATION DBA THE PATH FOUNDATION

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sandra E Lamb Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Capital Hospice0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph