Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sanders Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$656k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$1.0MRecreation & Sports$470kHealth$371kFood & Nutrition$245kPhilanthropy$170kYouth Development$50kCrime & Legal$45kCivil Rights$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $156k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $400k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND$400,000
UJA FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$50,000
TURTLE ATHLETIC FOUNDATION$50,000
ISLAND HARVEST$30,000
BOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION$26,250
THE BEST IS AHEAD FOUNDATION$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND$25,000
ISLAND HARVEST$20,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM$10,000
THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY$10,000
ENCOURAGE KIDS FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $365k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%ISLAND HARVEST LTD: $80k → 6%ISLAND HARVEST: $30k → 7%ISLAND HARVEST LTD: $45k → 6%ISLAND HARVEST: $30k → 7%ISLAND HARVEST: $20k → 7%ISLAND HARVEST: $20k → 7%ISLAND HARVEST: $20k → 7%ENCOURAGE KIDS FOUNDATION: $45k → 17%ENCOURAGE KIDS FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%ENCOURAGE KIDS FOUNDATION: $20k → 17%ENCOURAGE KIDS FOUNDATION: $20k → 17%ENCOURAGE KIDS FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 7 repeat orgs$780k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
13

Total granted

$1.7M
$645k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+29%

Still filing today

57%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $135k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BE
    BOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $251k · revenue +59%
  • IH
    ISLAND HARVEST LTD
    5× · 2020–2024 · $245k · revenue +34%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM
    2× · 2022–2024 · $20k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND - ATHLETICS
    one grant, 2022 · $400k
  • THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $40k · revenue -8%
  • EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue -45%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The International Legal Foundation Ltd

The ilf's mission is to make justice a reality for poor people by fighting to guarantee high-quality legal representation for everyone arrested or detained. around the world, we provide criminal defense services and build sustainable,…

International
2
American Friends of Beit Issie Shapiro Inc

The american friends of beit issie shapiro (afobis) is a national not for profit fundraising organization with regional offices in new york city, north miami beach, fl and los angeles, ca. afobis is dedicated to supporting beit issie…

Human Services
3
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
4
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal
5
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
6
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
7
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
8
Better Food Foundation Inc

To promote dietary changes to build a healthy, equitable, humane, and environmentally-sustainable food system.

Food & Nutrition
9
Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University Inc

The Knight First Amendment Institute defends the freedoms of speech and the press in the digital age through strategic litigation, research, public advocacy and public education. Our aim is to promote a system of free expression that is…

Education
10
Anti-Defamation League

Anti-defamation league (the "league") is a leading anti-hate organization that was founded in 1913 in response to an escalating climate of antisemitism and bigotry. (continued in sch. o)its timeless mission is to stop the defamation of the…

Civil Rights
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Robin Hood Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Best Is Ahead Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $825,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLANDUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND - ATHLETICS: $400,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND - ATHLETICSUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE: $175,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGEUNITED JEWISH APPEAL FEDERATION OF: $100,000 · OtherUNITED JEWISH APPEAL FEDERATION OF+8 more: $145,000 · Other+8 moreISLAND HARVEST LTD: $245,000 · Human ServicesISLAND HARVEST L…ENCOURAGE KIDS FOUNDATION: $120,000 · Human ServicesENCOURAGE KIDS F…BOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION: $251,250 · HealthBOOMER ESIA…UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CHILDREN DESERVE A CHANCE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTURTLE ATHLETIC FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentBEST IS AHEAD FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $40,000 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $30,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM: $20,000 · Arts & CultureWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $10,000 · International
Other$1,645,000Human Services$365,000Health$251,250Philanthropy$80,000Youth Development$75,000Civil Rights$70,000Arts & Culture$20,000International$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION: $251,250 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetISLAND HARVEST LTD: $245,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetENCOURAGE KIDS FOUNDATION: $120,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURTLE ATHLETIC FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEST IS AHEAD FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN DESERVE A CHANCE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sanders Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sanders Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sanders Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Sanders Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sanders Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph