Skip to content

· Community foundation

San Mateo-Foster City Community Education Foundation

The foundation is committed to reaching every child in the san mateo foster city school district.

$635k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$623k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$4.6M
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$622,740
Median grant
1
States reached
$332k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN MATEO-FOSTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT$622,740
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%BOREL MIDDLE SCHOOL: $6k → 7%SUNNYBRAE ELEMENTARY: $5k → 7%SAN MATEO ELEMENTARY TEACHERS ASSOCIATION: $5k → 7%SAN MATEO-FOSTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $1.1M → 7%SAN MATEO-FOSTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $824k → 7%SAN MATEO-FOSTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $623k → 7%SAN MATEO-FOSTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $605k → 7%SAN MATEO-FOSTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $519k → 7%SAN MATEO-FOSTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $292k → 7%SAN MATEO-FOSTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $273k → 7%SAN MATEO-FOSTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $171k → 7%SAN MATEO-FOSTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $109k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 3 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
1/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAN MATEO-FOSTER CITY COMMUNITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $4,560,928 · PhilanthropySAN MATEO-FOSTER CITY COMMUNITY EDUCATION FOUNDATIONSAN MATEO FOSTER CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $10,900 · OtherCalifornia Teachers Association-SMETA San Mateo Elementary Teachers Assoc: $5,180 · Other
Philanthropy$4,560,928Other$16,080

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN MATEO-FOSTER CITY COMMUNITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $4,560,928 over 9y, 100% of budgetCalifornia Teachers Association-SMETA San Mateo Elementary Teachers Assoc: $5,180 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization San Mateo-Foster City Community Education Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from San Mateo-Foster City Community Education Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on San Mateo-Foster City Community Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph