Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Samuel N Bemis Scholarship Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$68k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$68k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$584k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$67,523
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES$67,523
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TUFTS UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%CLARK UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%SMITH COLLEGE: $5k → 12%SPRINGFIELD COLLEGE: $5k → 17%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIV: $5k → 14%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES: $77k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $5k → 14%NORTHERN VERMONT UNIVERSITY AT JOHNSON: $5k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT: $5k → 10%BRATTLEBORO UNION: $27k → 11%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $5k → 10%BATES COLLEGE: $3k → 13%CLARK UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%SMITH COLLEGE: $5k → 12%SPRINGFIELD COLLEGE: $5k → 17%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIV: $5k → 14%BROWN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES: $68k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $5k → 14%JOHNSON STATE COLLEGE: $5k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT: $5k → 10%BRATTLEBORO UNION: $24k → 11%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $5k → 10%SPRINGFIELD COLLEGE: $5k → 17%OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES: $62k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $5k → 14%NORTHERN VERMONT UNIVERSITY AT JOHNSON: $5k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT: $3k → 10%BRATTLEBORO UNION: $17k → 11%OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES: $60k → 15%BRATTLEBORO UNION H S: $10k → 11%OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES: $60k → 15%OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES: $59k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
IL
MA
OH
RI
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$539k · 9 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$539k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+50%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TO
    THE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $385k · revenue +31%
  • University of Chicago
    3× · 2017–2019 · $16k · revenue +56%
  • TT
    THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE
    2× · 2018–2019 · $11k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • BU
    BRATTLEBORO UNION H S
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • CC
    COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF VERMONT - MONTPELIER
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • Trustees of Tufts Collegegraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +50%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
3
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
4
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
5
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
6
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
7
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
8
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
9
Whittier College

Whittier College is a residential four-year liberal arts institution that prepares students from diverse backgrounds to excel in a complex global society. Through challenging, interactive courses, taught by accomplished professors,…

Education
10
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

11
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
12
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trustees of Tufts College and the most unlike its peers is President and Trustees of Bates College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES — $384,698 · EducationTHE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGESUniversity of Chicago — $16,248 · Education+7 more — $65,835 · Education+7 moreIndividual grant recipient — $67,346 · OtherIndividual grant rec…UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT — $13,662 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VERMON…NORTHERN VERMONT UNIVERSITY AT JOHNSON — $10,180 · OtherNORTHERN VERMONT UNI…BRATTLEBORO UNION H S — $10,000 · OtherBRATTLEBORO UNION H …COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF VERMONT - MONTPELIER — $5,090 · OtherBROWN UNIVERSITY — $10,736 · Community Improvement
Education$466,781Other$106,278Community Improvement$10,736

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE OHIO FOUNDATION OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES — $384,698 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $16,248 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPRINGFIELD COLLEGE — $15,270 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College — $10,832 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE — $10,736 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $10,736 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF CLARK UNIVERSITY — $10,720 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University — $10,260 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $5,075 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE — $2,942 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Samuel N Bemis Scholarship Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Trustees of Tufts College11% of income from government
  • Trustees of Clark University2% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College0% of income from government
  • Springfield College0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph