Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Samuel Frankel and Jean Frankel Support Foundation

To support the jewish community and the community as a whole.

$33M
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$33M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

99% of Samuel Frankel and Jean Frankel Support Foundation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to United Jewish Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
17
4
18
4
19
4
20
1
21
1
22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Philanthropy$41MEducation$2.8MReligion$1.2M
02FY2022 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$32,503,505
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION$32,503,505
ADAT SHALOM SYNAGOGUE$450,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%UNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION: $32.5M → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $1.3M → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $3.2M → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN-CS MOTT: $73k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $2.9M → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN-CS MOTT: $69k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $626k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN-CS MOTT: $67k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $625k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN-CS MOTT: $66k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $625k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN-CS MOTT: $62k → 14%UNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION: $500k → 8%UNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION: $50k → 8%ADAT SHALOM SYNAGOGUE: $450k → 8%ADAT SHALOM SYNAGOGUE: $112k → 8%CONGREGATION SHIR TIKVAH: $242k → 8%ADAT SHALOM SYNAGOGUE: $108k → 8%CONGREGATION SHIR TIKVAH: $16k → 8%ADAT SHALOM SYNAGOGUE: $104k → 8%CONGREGATION SHIR TIKVAH: $15k → 8%ADAT SHALOM SYNAGOGUE: $99k → 8%CONGREGATION SHIR TIKVAH: $15k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 74% of Samuel Frankel and Jean Frankel Support Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Samuel Frankel and Jean Frankel Support Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
04Your field
05the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION — $33,053,505 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH FOUNDATIONJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT — $7,970,950 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROITREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $1,674,578 · OtherADAT SHALOM SYNAGOGUE — $873,545 · OtherCONGREGATION SHIR TIKVAH — $287,213 · OtherTHE WALSH COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $1,138,864 · Education
Philanthropy$41,024,455Other$2,835,336Education$1,138,864

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION — $33,053,505 over 3y, 33% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT — $7,970,950 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetTHE WALSH COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $1,138,864 over 4y, 8.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT
  • Who funds THE WALSH COLLEGE FOUNDATION

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Samuel Frankel and Jean Frankel Support Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph