Skip to content
Samuel & Mollie Jemal Foundation Co Jem Realty at a glance

· Private foundation

Samuel & Mollie Jemal Foundation Co Jem Realty

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$108k
Granted FY2025still arriving
65
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0177% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$857kArts & Culture$141kEducation$100kHuman Services$68kCommunity Improvement$55kHealth$35kYouth Development$24kFood & Nutrition$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 65 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k64 grants · $96k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$600
Median grant
6
States reached
$183k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DSN BEACH CLUB$12,000
Individual grant recipient$8,400
EDMOND J SAFRA SYNAG OF DEAL$7,185
LARCHWOOD SYNAGOUGUE INC$7,000
BRIDGE ACADEMY$6,000
RAMAZ$5,300
SHUVI NAFSHI FOUNDATION INC$5,200
OHR HALACHA$3,600
ILAN HIGH SCHOOL$3,600
PROAT YOSEPH FOUNDATION$3,600
Individual grant recipient$2,555
RISING HEROS$2,400
AHI EZER YESHIVA$2,400
HILLEL YESHIVA$2,400
BONEI OLAM$2,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $40 → 9%SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $4k → 11%THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $1k → 16%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $20 → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIKVOT: $1k → 9%MITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION CORP: $1k → 20%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $10 → 9%MITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION CORP: $561 → 20%MITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION CORP: $501 → 20%MITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION CORP: $360 → 20%MITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION CORP: $200 → 20%MOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 17%MOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER: $500 → 17%MOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER: $252 → 17%Sixth Street Community Center Inc: $1k → 17%MITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION CORP: $501 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $2k → 20%MISASKIM: $500 → 20%ATIME: $36 → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $8k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $7k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $6k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $4k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $3k → 20%SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $3k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $2k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $701 → 20%SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $680 → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $553 → 20%SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $500 → 20%OTSAR FAMILY SERVICE INC: $180 → 20%COMMUNITY ASSITANCE FUND: $1k → 20%COMMUNITY ASSITANCE FUND: $301 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MD
KS
DC
OK
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 134 repeat orgs$123k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

134 repeat relationships: 46 still active in FY2025, 88 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

134
118

Total granted

$1.4M
$94k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+9%

Still filing today

31%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationHealthInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $112k · revenue +32%
  • IH
    ILAN HIGH SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2025 · $34k · revenue +66%
  • SC
    SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $32k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $16k
  • EF
    EPILEPSY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
  • HO
    HATZALAH of South Florida
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Sherit Isroel
—
3
Congregation Beth-El Sephardic Center of Jamaica Estates

Congregation beth-el sephardic center of jamaica estates is a religious institution

Religion
4
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
5
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
6
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Yeshivas Nachlas Bnei Shimon

To provide financial assistance to jewish educational and charitable causes.

International
8
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
9
Friends of Yeshiva Beer Abraham

Furtherance of jewish education

Religion
10
Yeshiva Beit Rafael

Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.

Philanthropy
11
Yeshivat Leluv of Jerusalem Inc

Charitable work to help people in need

—
12
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Shaare Torah Inc; the most unlike its peers is Magen Avraham Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

86 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 86 of the 271 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
78/86
Grantees still filing
64/86
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAGEN DAVID YESHIVAH: $284,450 · OtherMAGEN DAVID YESHIVAHLARCHWOOD SYNAGOUGUE INC: $122,013 · OtherLARCHWOOD SYNAGOUGUE INCIndividual grant recipient: $58,209 · OtherEDMOND J SAFRA SYNAG OF DEAL: $54,355 · OtherLARCHWOOD SYNAGOGUE INC: $49,377 · OtherHILLEL YESHIVA: $45,253 · OtherCONGREGATION KEHILATH JESHURUN: $41,039 · Other+147 more: $479,691 · Other+147 moreFRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC: $112,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS O…KEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST: $9,401 · PhilanthropyKEREN HAY…UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $9,201 · PhilanthropyUNITED JE…+2 more: $1,411 · PhilanthropyILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $33,551 · EducationTHE BRIDGE ACADEMY INC: $28,100 · EducationSEPHARDIC ACADEMY OF MANHATTAN INC: $25,401 · EducationIMAGINE ACADEMY: $5,467 · EducationYESHIVA KETER TORAH INC: $3,711 · Education+8 more: $6,509 · EducationSEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC: $26,000 · ReligionShuvi Nafshi Foundation INC: $16,800 · ReligionCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF SOUTHERN FRANCE INC: $9,905 · ReligionRISING HEROES INC: $2,400 · Religion+10 more: $5,893 · ReligionSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $32,260 · Human ServicesMOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $3,753 · Human ServicesTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $3,600 · Human ServicesMITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION CORP: $3,123 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc: $2,400 · Human Services+5 more: $5,051 · Human ServicesDEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC: $23,762 · Youth DevelopmentSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $11,536 · Youth DevelopmentTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $23,001 · Food & NutritionSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $7,018 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,134,387Philanthropy$132,013Education$102,739Religion$60,998Human Services$50,187Youth Development$35,298Food & Nutrition$30,019

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC: $112,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $33,551 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $32,260 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BRIDGE ACADEMY INC: $28,100 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC: $26,000 over 4y, 38% of budgetSEPHARDIC ACADEMY OF MANHATTAN INC: $25,401 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetDEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC: $23,762 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $23,001 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetShuvi Nafshi Foundation INC: $16,800 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEHEBAR SEPHARDIC CENTER INC: $12,200 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC: $11,536 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF SOUTHERN FRANCE INC: $9,905 over 7y, 10% of budgetKEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST: $9,401 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $9,201 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $7,450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $7,018 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetIMAGINE ACADEMY: $5,467 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMOISE SAFRA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $3,753 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA KETER TORAH INC: $3,711 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SPECIAL CHILDREN CENTER: $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION CORP: $3,123 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetRISING HEROES INC: $2,400 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHATZALAH SOUTH FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDCIAL SERVICES INC: $1,603 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetREACH FOR THE STARS LEARNING CENTER: $1,503 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $1,459 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKINYANEI HATORAH YESHIVA CENTER INC: $1,206 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetNew York Cancer Center Inc: $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUpper East Side Hatzolah Inc: $1,050 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TIKVOT INC CO ARMEL LESLIE: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetEXCEED NETWORK: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSIXTH STREET COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOSDOT BETH YAAKOV: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $909 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetYeshivat Lev Torah: $902 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS OF COURAGE INC: $810 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC: $800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHEBRA AGUDAS ACHIM CHESED SHEL EMETH HEBREW FREE BURIAL ASSOCIATIONINC: $660 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEZER MIZION: $630 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBARKAI FOUNDATION INC: $602 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI MITZVAH INC: $601 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SHELLY COHEN BRIDAL FUND: $502 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNETIVEY OHR YAAKOV INC: $502 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONGREGATION RODFEH ZEDEK INC: $501 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC ↗
  • Who funds ILAN HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC MIKVEH OF MIDWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC ACADEMY OF MANHATTAN INC ↗
  • Who funds DEAL SEPHARDIC YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Shuvi Nafshi Foundation INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEHEBAR SEPHARDIC CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF SOUTHERN FRANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247 ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Amin and Lillian …Jack Adjmi Family Fou…The Howard Hoffman & …The Setton FoundationThe Ralph S Gindi Fam…The Jimmy and Berta K…Ralph J Harary Founda…Cabasso Family Founda…Jewish Communal FundAlbert & Melissa Sutt…Isaac & Marjorie Gind…Chehebar Family Found…
The Amin and Lillian Adjmi FoundationNY86.9× affinity40 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · The Setton Foundation · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · Cabasso Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Albert & Melissa Sutton Foundation · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · Chehebar Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Samuel & Mollie Jemal Foundation Co Jem Realty funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Samuel & Mollie Jemal Foundation Co Jem Realty. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Bet Yaakov of the Jersey Shore Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc: 8% of income from government
  • The Special Children Center: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 271 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Samuel & Mollie Jemal Foundation Co Jem Realty’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home