Skip to content

· Private foundation

Samuel & Jean Frankel Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$86MArts & Culture$5.2MEducation$1.2MHuman Services$150kPhilanthropy$110kRecreation & Sports$4k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $435k
  • $250k+3 grants · $30M
$175,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$52M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$19,600,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$10,000,000
DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$250,000
SPHINX ORGANIZATION$175,000
CRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY$159,600
KIDS KICKING CANCER$100,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF MICHIGAN$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF METRO DETROIT -: $150k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$92M · 9 repeat orgs$399k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against -25% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
7

Total granted

$92M
$398k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
-25%

Still filing today

67%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Michigan
    8× · 2017–2024 · $71M · revenue +202%
  • SO
    SPHINX ORGANIZATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +32%
  • CRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY
    6× · 2019–2024 · $690k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT
    one grant, 2019 · $150k · revenue -25%
  • SA
    STANLEY AND JUDITH FRANKEL FAMILY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue -46%
  • CE
    CRANBROOK EDUCATION COMMUNITY
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Science Center

The mission of the michigan science center is to inspire curious minds of all ages to discover, explore and appreciate science, technology, engineering and math in a creative, dynamic learning environment.

Education
2
Michigan School Band & Orchestra Assoc

Our mission is to provide each student intellectual and creative instrumental music experiences expressed through emotional and artistic communication.

Arts & Culture
3
Michigan School Vocal Music Association

Educate and inspire all people to understand and value the art of vocal music and its lifelong impact on the human spirit.

Arts & Culture
4
Michigan Virtual University

Maximize learning and teaching by bringing together the best in people and technology.

Education
5
Music Institute of Chicago

The music institute of chicago ("music institute") leads people toward a lifelong engagement with music, by providing widely accessible resources for high quality music teaching, performing, and service activities.

Arts & Culture
6
Hillel of Metropolitan Detroit

Inspire students to be active in jewish life.

Education
7
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
8
Masters School

The masters school celebrates active participation, deep understanding, and meaningful connection. a community of diverse individuals, we gather to learn, to strive, to dare, to do - to be a power for good in the world.

—
9
Michigan Association for Computer Users in Learning

Macul was established in 1975 and is dedicated to support the use of technology to enhance teaching and learning.

Education
10
Michigan Club Squash
Recreation & Sports
11
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
12
The University School of Milwaukee Corporation

University school of milwaukee cultivates excellence in learning, leadership, and citizenship for prekindergarten through 12th grade students. students are engaged, known, and valued within our passionate independent school community…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Center of Metropolitan Detroit; the most unlike its peers is Stanley and Judith Frankel Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Michigan: $71,000,000 · OtherUniversity of MichiganUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN - COMPREHENSIVE MEDICAL CANCER CENTER: $12,500,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN - COMPREHENSIVE MEDICAL CANCER CENTER+5 more: $2,535,000 · OtherDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $3,800,000 · Arts & CultureSPHINX ORGANIZATION INC: $1,400,000 · Arts & CultureCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY: $689,600 · Education+1 more: $10,000 · EducationKIDS KICKING CANCER INC: $200,000 · Health+1 more: $2,100 · HealthJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $150,000 · Human ServicesSTANLEY AND JUDITH FRANKEL FAMILY FOUNDATION: $100,000 · PhilanthropySPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$86,035,000Arts & Culture$5,200,000Education$699,600Health$202,100Human Services$150,000Philanthropy$100,000Recreation & Sports$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $3,800,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetSPHINX ORGANIZATION INC: $1,400,000 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY: $689,600 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetKIDS KICKING CANCER INC: $200,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $150,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSTANLEY AND JUDITH FRANKEL FAMILY FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBEYOND BASICS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN PSYCHOANALYTIC FOUNDATION INC: $2,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds SPHINX ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds KIDS KICKING CANCER INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds STANLEY AND JUDITH FRANKEL FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROMISE SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND BASICS ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN PSYCHOANALYTIC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Samuel & Jean Frankel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Samuel & Jean Frankel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Samuel & Jean Frankel Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Samuel & Jean Frankel Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Samuel & Jean Frankel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph