Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sample a M Scholarship Tuw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$243k
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$1.5MHuman Services$9k
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k32 grants · $136k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $107k
$5,470
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MADISYN NAIL CO UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA$16,825
FELICIA MCINNIS CO UNIV OF CENTRAL FL$16,510
HANNAH M PAYNE CO PALM BEACH STATE$15,000
AJEYA ADAMS CO FLORIDA AGRICULTURAL$12,975
LILIANNA BROWN CO INDIAN RIVER STATE$11,885
JOANNA RUBEL CO FLORIDA STATE UNIV$11,638
CAROLINE CREWS CO UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA$11,625
MAKAYLA SMITH CO FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY$10,250
CARRIGAN CRAMER CO UNIVERSITY OF FLORID$8,943
CHASE STOTTLEMIRE CO UNIV OF CENTRAL FL$8,943
ALIANA STERRETT CO UNIV OF CENTRAL FL$8,575
LANEY KEYS CO FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY$7,850
NYIAH MONDS CO FLORIDA A&M UNIV$7,848
MADISON HANCOCK CO POST UNIVERSITY$5,625
MYLA SMITH CO INDIAN RIVER STATE$5,625
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HANNAH M PAYNE CO PALM BEACH STATE: $15k → 11%THOMAS KINDRED CO STETSON UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%FELICIA MCINNIS CO UNIV OF CENTRAL FL: $17k → 13%INDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $213k → 13%BRAYDON REYNOLDS CO SOUTHEASTERN UNIV: $4k → 16%JOANNA RUBEL CO FLORIDA STATE UNIV: $12k → 19%SYNDEY CORBETT CO PALM BEACH ATLANTIC: $3k → 11%CHASE STOTTLEMIRE CO UNIV OF CENTRAL FL: $9k → 13%INDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $202k → 13%MALIKA MORGAN CO SOUTHEASTERN UNIV: $4k → 16%LANEY KEYS CO FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY: $8k → 19%RAPHAEL FERNADES - FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIV: $5k → 11%ALIANA STERRETT CO UNIV OF CENTRAL FL: $9k → 13%INDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $198k → 13%GABRIELLA TANGO CO FLORIDA STATE UNIV: $5k → 19%BRIANA CHIBAS CO FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIV: $5k → 11%YAZMIN SOSA CO UNIV OF CENTRAL FLORIDA: $5k → 13%INDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $184k → 13%ABBY KEITH CO FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 19%KATHRYN BUCHMEYER CO UNIV OF CENTRAL FL: $3k → 13%INDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $177k → 13%ADA KEITH CO FOLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 19%LILIANNA BROWN CO INDIAN RIVER STATE: $12k → 13%AJEYA ADAMS CO FLORIDA AGRICULTURAL: $13k → 19%MYLA SMITH CO INDIAN RIVER STATE: $6k → 13%MAKAYLA SMITH CO FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY: $10k → 19%RYLEE NEENER CO INDIAN RIVER STATE: $6k → 13%NYIAH MONDS CO FLORIDA A&M UNIV: $8k → 19%GABRIELLA ROUNDS CO INDIAN RIVER STATE: $5k → 13%JAYLA BUTLER CO INDIAN RIVER STATE: $3k → 13%CAITLIN DESARRO CO INDIAN RIVER STATE: $3k → 13%JOHNATHAN DESARRO CO INDIAN RIVER STATE: $3k → 13%KENDALL RUCKS CO INDIAN RIVER STATE: $2k → 13%CARLYSA LINCOLN CO INDIAN RIVER STATE: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 32 repeat orgs$140k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
12

Total granted

$1.4M
$76k

Still filing today

3%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $64k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    INDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $974k · revenue +226%
  • MN
    MADISYN NAIL CO UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
    3× · 2023–2025 · $31k
  • CC
    CAROLINE CREWS CO UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
    3× · 2023–2025 · $26k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $9k
  • SC
    STEPHEN CHARLES CO FLORIDA STATE UNIV
    one grant, 2023 · $9k
  • RT
    RACHEL TILTON CO SOUTHEASTERN UNIV
    one grant, 2023 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2018–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2018 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
1/1
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $973,820 · EducationINDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCMADISYN NAIL CO UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $31,450 · OtherMADISYN NAIL CO UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDACAROLINE CREWS CO UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $25,950 · OtherFELICIA MCINNIS CO UNIV OF CENTRAL FL: $22,135 · OtherLILIANNA BROWN CO INDIAN RIVER STATE: $21,170 · OtherMAKAYLA SMITH CO FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY: $20,261 · OtherHANNAH M PAYNE CO PALM BEACH STATE: $20,000 · OtherAJEYA ADAMS CO FLORIDA AGRICULTURAL: $19,600 · Other+53 more: $371,474 · Other+53 more
Education$973,820Other$532,040

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $973,820 over 5y, 3.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sample a M Scholarship Tuw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sample a M Scholarship Tuw. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sample a M Scholarship Tuw’s filings →

    More from the funding graph