Skip to content

· Private foundation

Salvatore & Anna Beltrone Family Fn Selina Beltrone Plotkin Trustee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$114k
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$902kHealth$335kHuman Services$138kAnimals$36kHousing & Shelter$13kFood & Nutrition$9kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kArts & Culture$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k35 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $75k
$1,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DANA FARBER CANCER RESEARCH$40,000
COLONIE SENIOR SERVICE CENTERS$35,204
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$4,288
SHRINERS HOSPITAL$3,467
SMILE TRAIN$3,250
SALVATION ARMY GREATER NY$3,000
THE RIDGEFIELD PLAYHOUSE$2,500
13 HANDS EQUINE RESCUE INC$2,080
MAKE A WISH HUDSON VALLEY$2,000
GREATER GOOD CHARITIES$1,858
THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE USA$1,500
FEEDING WESTCHESTER$1,500
SOLES 4 SOULS$1,046
GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND$1,030
MERCY SHIPS$1,030
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $128k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ORPHAN ACRES: $500 → 16%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $300 → 14%SOLES 4 SOULS: $1k → 14%ORPHAN ACRES: $325 → 16%COLONIE SENIOR SERVICE CENTERS: $35k → 14%SOLES 4 SOULS: $1k → 14%ORPHAN ACRES INC: $100 → 16%COLONIE SENIOR SERVICE CENTERS: $19k → 14%SOLES 4 SOULS: $500 → 14%COLONIE SENIOR SERVICE CENTERS: $18k → 14%SOLES 4 SOULS: $500 → 14%COLONIE SENIOR SERVICE CENTERS: $11k → 14%SOLES 4 SOULS: $300 → 14%COLONIE SENIOR SERVICE CENTERS: $10k → 14%SOLES 4 SOULS: $250 → 14%COLONIE SENIOR SERVICE CENTERS: $10k → 14%SOLES 4 SOULS: $250 → 14%COLONIE SENIOR SERVICE CENTERS: $5k → 14%SOLES 4 SOULS: $50 → 14%COLONIE SENIOR SERVICE CENTERS: $4k → 14%COLONIE SENIOR SERVICE CENTERS: $2k → 14%COLONIE SENIOR SERVICE CENTERS: $670 → 14%COLONIE SENIOR SERVICE CENTERS: $125 → 14%COLONIE SENIOR SERVICE CENTERS: $11 → 14%COVENANT HOUSE: $2k → 17%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 9%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 9%COVENANT HOUSE: $500 → 17%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 9%COVENANT HOUSE: $300 → 17%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 9%COVENANT HOUSE: $250 → 17%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $250 → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $200 → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 9%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
ID
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
WY
PA
CT
CA
VA
MD
NM
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$527k · 44 repeat orgs$501k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

44 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
35

Total granted

$527k
$491k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+11%

Still filing today

75%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CultureRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +19%
  • OS
    OPERATION SMILE INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $13k · revenue +60%
  • 1H
    13 HANDS EQUINE RESCUE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • TL
    THE LITTLE BLESSING FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $469k
  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • SJ
    ST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
2
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
3
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
4
The Humane Society of Rochester & Monroe County for the Prevention of Cruelty to

Together with our community, we better the lives of animals through justice, prevention, and life-saving care. lollypop farm, the humane society of greater rochester, envisions a just and compassionate world for all animals.

Animals
5
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
6
Four Paws International Inc

Our vision is a world where humans treat animals with respect, empathy and understanding. four paws mission is to be the strong, global and independent voice for animals.

Animals
7
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
8
New Hampshire Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To save the lives of animals through rescue, rehabilitation and adoption; to promote learning, eliminate animal cruelty and be a leader in advancing the highest standards in animal welfare.

Animals
9
Animal Care and Control of New York City Inc

Animal care centers of nyc's (acc) mission is to end animal homelessness in nyc.

Animals
10
Pet Animal Welfare Society of Connecticut Inc

Pet animal welfare society of ct (paws), established in 1962, is a no-kill animal rescue shelter dedicated to the rescue and adoption of our community's homeless and abused dogs and cats. paws efforts are focused on three critical needs:…

Animals
11
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
12
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Good Charities; the most unlike its peers is 13 Hands Equine Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
59/59
Grantees still filing
38/59
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE LITTLE BLESSING FOUNDATION: $468,710 · OtherTHE LITTLE BLESSING FOUNDATIONDANA FARBER CANCER RESEARCH: $280,000 · OtherDANA FARBER CANCER RESEARCH+53 more: $95,243 · Other+53 moreNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $429,564 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST+3 more: $3,458 · PhilanthropyCOLONIE SENIOR SERVICES CENTERS INC: $114,176 · Human ServicesCOLONIE S…GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $4,580 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $4,550 · Human Services+3 more: $5,121 · Human Services13 HANDS EQUINE RESCUE INC: $10,845 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $3,750 · AnimalsRidgefield Operation for Animal Rescue Inc: $3,500 · AnimalsTHE KINDNESS RANCH ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $1,200 · AnimalsLIFESAVERS INC: $1,132 · AnimalsMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,000 · Animals+11 more: $4,275 · AnimalsOPERATION SMILE INC: $13,228 · InternationalMercy Ships International: $1,030 · International+3 more: $1,402 · InternationalSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $3,467 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,025 · HealthCOMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER INC: $2,800 · Recreation & SportsFRESH AIR FUND: $2,050 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $150 · Recreation & Sports
Other$843,953Philanthropy$433,022Human Services$128,427Animals$25,702International$15,660Health$5,492Recreation & Sports$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $429,564 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLONIE SENIOR SERVICES CENTERS INC: $114,176 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $14,178 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $13,228 over 6y, 0.0% of budget13 HANDS EQUINE RESCUE INC: $10,845 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE HUDSON VALLEY: $5,750 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $5,350 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $4,580 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $4,550 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOLES4SOULS INC: $3,896 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $3,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChristian Herald Association Inc: $3,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRidgefield Operation for Animal Rescue Inc: $3,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNew York City Rescue Mission: $3,450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $3,425 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $3,002 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER GOOD CHARITIES: $2,858 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER INC: $2,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RIDGEFIELD PLAYHOUSE FOR MOVIES AND THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND: $2,050 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,025 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KINDNESS RANCH ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIFESAVERS INC: $1,132 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SALEM OPEN LAND FOUNDATION INC: $1,021 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSARATOGA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORPHAN ACRES INC: $925 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC: $850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFARM SANCTUARY INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASTLETON RANCH HORSE RESCUE INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKATONAH VILLAGE LIBRARY: $510 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOUR CORNERS EQUINE RESCUE: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $402 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEQUINE ADVOCATES INCORPORATED: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $292 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALDRICH CONTEMPORARY ART MUSEUM INC: $258 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING PETS OF THE HOMELESS AKA PETS OF THE HOMELESS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINTE DONKEY RESCUE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds COLONIE SENIOR SERVICES CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds 13 HANDS EQUINE RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE HUDSON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds SOLES4SOULS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds Christian Herald Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Ridgefield Operation for Animal Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds New York City Rescue Mission ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds GREATER GOOD CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RIDGEFIELD PLAYHOUSE FOR MOVIES AND THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRESH AIR FUND ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds INNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE KINDNESS RANCH ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds LIFESAVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds NORTH SALEM OPEN LAND FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PC Fund for Animals Charitable TrWY19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Joyce a Ward Foundation · The Susan and Ford Schumann Foundation · Surendra and Karen Gupta Arc Foundation · Bradford Family Foundation · Edwin D Marks Animal Foundation · Austen-Stokes Ancient Americas Foundation Inc · The Weill Family Foundation · Paula Knickerbocker Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Salvatore & Anna Beltrone Family Fn Selina Beltrone Plotkin Trustee funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Salvatore & Anna Beltrone Family Fn Selina Beltrone Plotkin Trustee. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • The Aldrich Contemporary Art Museum Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
  • The Ridgefield Playhouse for Movies and the Performing Arts Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Amherst College Trustees: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 92 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Salvatore & Anna Beltrone Family Fn Selina Beltrone Plotkin Trustee’s filings →

More from the funding graph