Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

North Carolina · Public charity

Salisbury-Rowan Economic Development Commission

Promoting economic and industrial development in rowan county, north carolina

$26k
Granted FY2019
2
Grants FY2019
2
Organizations funded FY2019
100%
First-time grantees FY2019
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2019
$20,500
Largest grant, FY2019
$20,500
Organizations funded a year
1 to 2
FY2017 to FY2019
Total assets, FY2019
$467k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2019, 100% of the organizations Salisbury-Rowan Economic Development Commission funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20192$26k100%
FY20171$30kn/a
67% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Environment$30kRecreation & Sports$21kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest grants in FY2019.

NEW YORK AIR BRAKE$20,500
Individual grant recipient$5,385

Compare Salisbury-Rowan Economic Development Commission with peer funders

About Salisbury-Rowan Economic Development Commission

How much does Salisbury-Rowan Economic Development Commission give?
Salisbury-Rowan Economic Development Commission reported 2 grants totaling $25,885 in its FY2019 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 2 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2019.
What does Salisbury-Rowan Economic Development Commission fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2019, its largest causes are Environment (54%), Recreation & Sports (37%).
Does Salisbury-Rowan Economic Development Commission fund new organizations?
In FY2019, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Salisbury-Rowan Economic Development Commission based?
Salisbury-Rowan Economic Development Commission is based in NC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Salisbury-Rowan Economic Development Commission’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home