Skip to content
Saint Vincent de Paul Conference of Our Lady Star at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Saint Vincent de Paul Conference of Our Lady Star

The society of st.

$798k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0174% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant grouped by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Human Services$257kFood & Nutrition$150kOther$140k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $259,519, the rows itemized in this filing. The $798,140 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $538,621 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $179k
$50,806
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BREMERTON FOODLINE$64,719
SOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE$63,792
CENTRAL KITSAP FOOD BANK$50,806
BAINBRIDGE HELPLINE$41,657
SHARENET FOODBANK$38,545
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $257k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE: $71k → 10%SOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE: $64k → 10%NORTH KITSAP FISHLINE: $32k → 10%BAINBRIDGE HELPLINE HOUSE: $49k → 10%BAINBRIDGE HELPLINE: $42k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$516k · 5 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
1

Total granted

$516k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BF
    Bremerton Foodline
    2× · 2024–2025 · $140k · revenue 0%
  • SK
    SOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $135k · revenue +191%
  • HH
    HELPLINE HOUSE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $91k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • NK
    NORTH KITSAP FISHLINE
    one grant, 2024 · $32k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
1/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE: $134,929 · Human ServicesSOUTH KITSAP HELPLINEHELPLINE HOUSE: $90,745 · Human ServicesHELPLINE HOUSENORTH KITSAP FISHLINE: $31,642 · Human ServicesNORTH KITSAP FISHLINECentral Kitsap Food Bank: $79,957 · Food & NutritionCentral Kitsap Food BankSharenet Food Bank: $70,135 · Food & NutritionSharenet Food BankBremerton Foodline: $140,183 · OtherBremerton Foodline
Human Services$257,316Food & Nutrition$150,092Other$140,183

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBremerton Foodline: $140,183 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetSOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE: $134,929 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetHELPLINE HOUSE: $90,745 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCentral Kitsap Food Bank: $79,957 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSharenet Food Bank: $70,135 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetNORTH KITSAP FISHLINE: $31,642 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Saint Vincent de Paul Conference of Our Lady Star?

Find your warmest path to Saint Vincent de Paul Conference of Our Lady Star through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Saint Vincent de Paul Conference of Our Lady Star’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home