Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Utah · Public charity

Sageland Collaborative

To provide science-based strategies for wildlife and land conservation.

$44k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
3
Itemized grants FY2025
1
Organizations funded FY2024
100%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$37k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$10,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$18,926
Organizations funded a year
1 to 2
FY2023 to FY2024
Total assets, FY2025
$2.8M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 100% of the organizations Sageland Collaborative funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving3$37k100%
FY20241$13k100%
FY20232$57kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Animals$82kEnvironment$24k

Top grantees

Largest grants in FY2025.

Utah State University$18,926
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$7,577

Compare Sageland Collaborative with peer funders

About Sageland Collaborative

How much does Sageland Collaborative give?
Sageland Collaborative reported 3 itemized grants totaling $36,503, out of $44,244 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 2 organizations a year over FY2023 to FY2024.
What does Sageland Collaborative fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2025, its largest causes are Animals (77%), Environment (23%).
Does Sageland Collaborative fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Sageland Collaborative based?
Sageland Collaborative is based in UT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sageland Collaborative’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home