Skip to content

· Public charity

Sage Patient Advocates

SAGE PATIENT ADVOCATES supports patients in their battle with serious illness.

$58k
Granted FY2021
13
Grants FY2021
7
States reached
$16k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

56% of Sage Patient Advocates’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Sage Patient Advocates named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $58k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
’17
2
’18
2
’19
2
’20
5
’21
2
’22
3
’23
2
’24
1
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$183kEducation$8kReligion$5kOther$0
02FY2021 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k10 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $38k
$2,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$493k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS CANCER CENTER$16,075
MAYO CLINIC$12,000
INFLAMMATORY BREAST CANCER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION$10,000
TRIAGE CANCER$5,000
EVERGREEN VALLEY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$5,000
BAYLOR COLLEGE MEDICAL$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
SCRIPPS HEALTH FOUNDATION$2,500
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION CANCER RESEARCH$1,500
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMOTOLGY$400
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$250
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$211
Individual grant recipient$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TRIAGE CANCER: $11k → 14%TRIAGE CANCER: $10k → 14%TRIAGE CANCER: $5k → 14%TRIAGE CANCER: $2k → 14%TRIAGE CANCER: $1k → 14%TRIAGE CANCER: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
ND
MN
IL
NY
PA
NJ
CA
UT
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$118k · 12 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against +56% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2021, 7 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$118k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+56%

Still filing today

25%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TRIAGE CANCER
    6× · 2018–2025 · $29k · revenue +285%
  • Vanderbilt University
    3× · 2020–2023 · $6k · revenue +65%
  • THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $1k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • M
    MDACC
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • FC
    FARGO CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $500
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
3
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
4
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
American College of Radiology

The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…

Health
7
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
8
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
9
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
10
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
11
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
12
Van Andel Research Institute

Medical research organization van andel research institute is an independent biomedical research organization committed to improving the health and enhancing the lives of current and future generations.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS CANCER CENTER: $33,255 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS CANCER CENTERINFLAMMATORY BREAST CANCER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $23,500 · OtherINFLAMMATORY BREAST CANCER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATIONCOLUMBIA: $20,000 · OtherCOLUMBIAUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL: $11,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILLEVERGREEN VALLEY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH INC: $5,000 · Other+14 more: $22,853 · Other+14 moreTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $32,500 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLU…Vanderbilt University: $5,500 · EducationVanderbilt Universit…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · EducationMAYO CLINIC: $12,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICVanderbilt University Medical Center: $10,000 · HealthVanderbilt Unive…THE CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA FOUNDATION: $5,182 · HealthTHE CHOLANGIOCAR…SCRIPPS HEALTH: $2,500 · HealthSCRIPPS HEALTH+4 more: $1,611 · HealthTRIAGE CANCER: $29,272 · Human ServicesTRIAGE CANCERTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$116,108Education$40,000Health$31,293Human Services$29,272Public Safety & Disaster$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $32,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRIAGE CANCER: $29,272 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA FOUNDATION: $5,182 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSCRIPPS HEALTH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCaringBridge: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $211 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds TRIAGE CANCER ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds THE CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SCRIPPS HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CaringBridge ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sage Patient Advocates funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sage Patient Advocates. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sage Patient Advocates’ filings →

    More from the funding graph