Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Georgia · Public charity

Safe Harbor Center Inc

Safe Harbor's mission is to provide services that promote security and stability for at-risk families, children and individuals.

$356k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
3
Itemized grants FY2024
2
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$45k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$14,742
Largest grant, FY2024
$18,192
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$5.7M
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Human Services$113kHealth$12k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Wayne County Protective Agency Inc$85,82226%
Young Mens Christian Association of Coastal Georgia Inc$27,02920%
Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities$11,64010%

Compare Safe Harbor Center Inc with peer funders

About Safe Harbor Center Inc

How much does Safe Harbor Center Inc give?
Safe Harbor Center Inc reported 3 itemized grants totaling $44,574, out of $356,288 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Safe Harbor Center Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2024, its largest causes are Human Services (91%), Health (9%).
Who are Safe Harbor Center Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2024: Wayne County Protective Agency Inc ($86k), Young Mens Christian Association of Coastal Georgia Inc ($27k), Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities ($12k).
Where is Safe Harbor Center Inc based?
Safe Harbor Center Inc is based in GA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $452k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Safe Harbor Center’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home