· Public charity
Sacramento District Council St Vincent de Paul Society
A network of friends, inspired by gospel values, growing in holiness and building a more just world through personal relationships with and service to people in need.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $166,848 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $238,059 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $71,211 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $152k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SACRAMENTO EAST DISTRICT COUNCIL | $45,121 |
| NORTH STATE DISTRICT COUNCIL | $38,407 |
| SOLANO COUNTY DISTRICT COUNCIL | $22,960 |
| SO SACRAMENTO ELK GROVE DISTRICT COUNCIL | $20,770 |
| YOLO METRO DISTRICT COUNCIL | $13,680 |
| PLACER YUBA SUTTER BUTTE DISTRICT COUNCIL | $10,910 |
| OUR LADY OF THE ASSUMPTION | $7,500 |
| OUR LADY OF GRACE CONFERENCE | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $263k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SESACRAMENTO EAST DISTRICT COUNCIL SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL3× · 2022–2024 · $107k
- NSNORTHERN STATE DISTRICT COUNCIL SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL3× · 2022–2024 · $60k
- SDSOLANO DISTRICT COUNCIL SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL3× · 2022–2024 · $56k
Funded once
- OLOUR LADY OF THE ASSUMPTION SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAULone grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue +23%
- POPASTOR OF OUR LADY OF GRACE PARISH WEST SACRAMENTO A CORPORATION SOLEone grant, 2024 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SACRAMENTO EAST DISTRICT COUNCIL SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN STATE DISTRICT COUNCIL SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ↗
- Who funds SOLANO DISTRICT COUNCIL SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ↗
- Who funds SOUTH SACRAMENTO ELK GROVE DISTRICT SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ↗
- Who funds YOLO DELTA DISTRICT COUNCIL SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ↗
- Who funds PLACER YUBA BUTTE SUTTER DISTRICT COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds OUR LADY OF THE ASSUMPTION SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sacramento District Council St Vincent de Paul Society funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.