Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

S&W Greenbaum Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$25k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0180% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$187kInternational$22kReligion$8kHealth$7kFood & Nutrition$4kCivil Rights$2kPhilanthropy$1kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$25,155
Median grant
1
States reached
$115k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS$25,155
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%American Friends of Yad Eliezer: $3k → 11%Selfhelp Community Services Inc: $250 → 17%Kimpatorin Aid: $430 → 20%Oneg Shabbat of the West Side: $200 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$203k · 5 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
30

Total granted

$203k
$45k

Still filing today

0%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CultureEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • V
    VARIOUS
    6× · 2019–2024 · $181k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NISHMAT
    2× · 2017–2018 · $19k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
  • EM
    EZER MIZION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -13%
  • RS
    RAMAZ SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ohr Meir Ubracha

The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.

Philanthropy
2
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
3
Israel Cancer Research Fund Inc

To support cancer research in israel, for the benefit of israel and all mankind.

4
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
5
American Friends of Torah and Tefilah Ramat Eshkol Inc

To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.

Religion
6
Humanitarian Partnership for Israel

Providing financial assistance to needy individuals as well as to other charitable, educational, and religious organizations in israel and worldwide

Philanthropy
7
Partners Charity Fund for Israel

To support charitable organization and programs providing food, clothing and financial aid to indigent individuals and families in financial distress.

Philanthropy
8
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
9
Nezer Yisroel Inc
10
Yeshivah Beth Israel Tifereth Menachem Foundation

To provide support to jewish religious education in israel and around the world, and provide financial assistance to and on behalf of yeshivah beth israel tifereth menachem.

Education
11
American Friends of Tzohar

Support of tzohar-a school for special needs children located in israel

12
American Friends of Menuchas Asher Csenger Inc

To promote, benefit, and support jewish educational activities in israel

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Us Friends of Yad Ezrah Inc and the most unlike its peers is Richard Tucker Music Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VARIOUS — $180,793 · OtherVARIOUSAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NISHMAT — $19,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NISHMAT+21 more — $34,380 · Other+21 moreEZER MIZION — $5,000 · InternationalAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC — $275 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC — $3,600 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $575 · PhilanthropyUS FRIENDS OF YAD EZRAH INC — $250 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $180 · Philanthropy+1 more — $50 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER — $2,600 · Human ServicesKIMPATORIN AID INC — $430 · Human ServicesSELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $250 · Human ServicesONEG SHABBAT OF THE WEST SIDE DBA TOMCHEI SHABBOS OF MANHATTAN — $200 · Human ServicesRICHARD TUCKER MUSIC FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · Arts & CultureKEREN OR INC — $360 · Education
Other$234,173International$5,275Philanthropy$4,655Human Services$3,480Arts & Culture$1,000Education$360

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEZER MIZION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC — $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER — $2,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $575 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIMPATORIN AID INC — $430 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEREN OR INC — $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC — $275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUS FRIENDS OF YAD EZRAH INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONEG SHABBAT OF THE WEST SIDE DBA TOMCHEI SHABBOS OF MANHATTAN — $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHASC PA INC — $50 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EZER MIZION
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER
  • Who funds RICHARD TUCKER MUSIC FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC
  • Who funds KIMPATORIN AID INC
  • Who funds KEREN OR INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC
  • Who funds SELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds US FRIENDS OF YAD EZRAH INC
  • Who funds ONEG SHABBAT OF THE WEST SIDE DBA TOMCHEI SHABBOS OF MANHATTAN
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
  • Who funds HASC PA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY12.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization S&W Greenbaum Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph